Still can get it stable the rpm just are all over the place
The only way I can get it operate close is to set the scale gain to 1 and
set s from 1 to 20 rps then it works
When I look at the ppmc.0.encoder.03.velocity signal it counts by 4 witch I
can see why the rpms are all over the place 4*60 =2
On Friday 13 July 2012 21:52:17 andy pugh did opine:
> On 13 July 2012 18:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I should use a steeper taper, one that is supposedly self ejecting
> > since the screw won't have a lot of push available to force the
> > separation.
>
> It might have a lot more push than you
Am 09.07.2012 um 19:17 schrieb Bryce Johnson:
> I'm running one of the newer 2.6pre from the buildbot repo. I noticed that
> if I stop the operation on a tool change "change to tool 6" and start from
> the beginning on the file (tool 1). It asks for tool 6 again instead of
> tool 1. If I put i
On 13 July 2012 18:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I should use a steeper taper, one that is supposedly self ejecting since
> the screw won't have a lot of push available to force the separation.
It might have a lot more push than you imagine. How much force does it
take to strip that thread size?
The
Greetings;
While I await a new soldering iron so I can fix one of the lags in the
spindle control & make my electronic fuse do an estop idea work, and
intermittently studying the pix Andy sent the links to, that is what I am
going to try and build. However, the extreme low angle I see means it
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Hugh Wylie wrote:
>
>
> Something I wish to know (which our Mesa colleagues will I am sure answer)
> is the tradeoff between control loop time and number of pulse generator and
> stepper motor instances invoked in the 5i23. How is the stepper control loop
> cycle time affected
On Friday 13 July 2012 06:20:53 Viesturs Lācis did opine:
> 2012/7/13 Hugh Wylie :
> > Having deleted MIN_VELOCITY parms and correcting the A-joint type to
> > LINEAR, the time lag (having resulted from very different velocity
> > vector commands to the 5i23) is eliminated.
>
> Glad to hear that.
On 13 July 2012 10:01, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> What else could that be?
Don't overlook the possibility of a mechanical problem. A pulley
slipping on a motor shaft, for example.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
On 13 July 2012 07:26, Hugh Wylie wrote:
> Having deleted MIN_VELOCITY parms and correcting the A-joint type to LINEAR,
> the time lag (having resulted from very different velocity vector commands
> to the 5i23) is eliminated.
I am very puzzled about why either of these has any effect.
MIN_VELOC
2012/7/13 Hugh Wylie :
>
> Having deleted MIN_VELOCITY parms and correcting the A-joint type to LINEAR,
> the time lag (having resulted from very different velocity vector commands
> to the 5i23) is eliminated.
Glad to hear that.
Could You, please, explain a little more about the relation between
10 matches
Mail list logo
