On Friday 03 July 2015 20:39:39 Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 02:28 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> If we assume a mill with zero backlash and spindle-speed very
> much larger than the feed-rate, would you still care or be
> careful about direction?
> >>>
> >>> Call me a picky ol
On 07/04/2015 02:28 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
If we assume a mill with zero backlash and spindle-speed very much
larger than the feed-rate, would you still care or be careful about
direction?
>>>
>>> Call me a picky old fart,
>>
>> I would not dare call you picky.
>
> Oh? why not?
On Friday 03 July 2015 20:19:09 Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 01:48 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> If we assume a mill with zero backlash and spindle-speed very much
> >> larger than the feed-rate, would you still care or be careful about
> >> direction?
> >
> > Call me a picky old fart,
>
On 07/04/2015 01:48 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> If we assume a mill with zero backlash and spindle-speed very much
>> larger than the feed-rate, would you still care or be careful about
>> direction?
>
> Call me a picky old fart,
I would not dare call you picky. The other part I have no comment. ;
On 07/04/2015 01:54 AM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
> If you look at something like Vectric's V-carve Pro it does the faster
> no-lift case. I suspect the high-end Aspire tool does the same since they
> are based on the same code base. For something like an A they don't even
> lift to go back a littl
If you look at something like Vectric's V-carve Pro it does the faster
no-lift case. I suspect the high-end Aspire tool does the same since they
are based on the same code base. For something like an A they don't even
lift to go back a little to get to the cross bar. And its geared towards
wood
On Friday 03 July 2015 19:32:08 Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 01:06 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> What is the experience of the people here? What would be
> >> preferable? A quick (case 1) path or a directionally consistent
> >> path (case 2)?
> >
> > If you see more than a nearly invisi
On 07/04/2015 01:06 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> What is the experience of the people here? What would be preferable? A
>> quick (case 1) path or a directionally consistent path (case 2)?
>
> If you see more than a nearly invisible artifact using the first method,
> then it is time to tweak the bac
On Friday 03 July 2015 17:38:13 Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While porting the Hershey fonts for engraving it occurred to me that
> they are very heavy in pen-up/down movements because many strokes are
> partials. There is plenty of room for optimization, reducing the rapid
> moves by abou
On 3 July 2015 at 23:43, Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> Well, not really as a flag. The strokes are a the primary part of the
> font-definition. It would mean to create an alternative version of the
> font face.
I was just about to suggest that. Hershey_fast and
Hershey_unidirectional maybe?
--
atp
On 07/04/2015 12:18 AM, Bruce Layne wrote:
> Even on a CNC router or a mill, there is a large amount of variation in
> the results depending on spindle speed, cutter diameter, grain structure
> and other physical properties of the material being engraved, etc.
> Secondary operations are also a
Lasers engrave too, and should produce the same results in both of your
examples, although much quicker in the first example.
Even on a CNC router or a mill, there is a large amount of variation in
the results depending on spindle speed, cutter diameter, grain structure
and other physical prope
Hi all,
While porting the Hershey fonts for engraving it occurred to me that
they are very heavy in pen-up/down movements because many strokes are
partials. There is plenty of room for optimization, reducing the rapid
moves by about 30%, but that means that engraving is not done in a
consistent di
On Friday 03 July 2015 10:07:35 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 23:02:31 -0400
> > From: Gene Heskett
> > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> >
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] More pro
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 23:02:31 -0400
> From: Gene Heskett
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] More progress
> SNIP-
On 01.07.15 16:14, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The link should then be valid for anyone clicking on it if their email
> agent sticks to the rfc's that try to govern how the net works.
Firefox does not mind a URL in two parts, broken over two lines.
I just highlight the two lines with the mouse, then pas
Don't forget to use the coupons to save even more.
July 4-5 JULY4TH15% off
this one seems to work all the timeNEWSITE1010% off
I buy a lot of stuff from McMaster Carr too and like Albany the
fasteners are made in the USA.
JT
On 7/2/2015 7:24 PM, Bruce Layne wrote:
> Thank you
17 matches
Mail list logo
