On 03/30/2016 05:04 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 10:12, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> joints_axes is probably the best solution, but you could try:
>
> Just as confirmation that joints_axes12 allows world-mode jogging:
> http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=55440f8
On 30 March 2016 at 10:12, andy pugh wrote:
> joints_axes is probably the best solution, but you could try:
Just as confirmation that joints_axes12 allows world-mode jogging:
http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=55440f8
But in your situation the "gantry" component is pro
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 16:57:53 andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 20:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> But, if you do decide to import from the UK you can probably knock
> >> 20% VAT off the price, and might want to consider these too:
> >> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Collets/ER-C
On 30 March 2016 at 20:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> But, if you do decide to import from the UK you can probably knock 20%
>> VAT off the price, and might want to consider these too:
>> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Collets/ER-Collet-Fixtures/Ste
>>vensons-ER25-Collet-Blocks
>
> Neat, but
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 15:50:02 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 13:39:37 andy pugh wrote:
> > On 30 March 2016 at 18:26, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > So that would translate to around 8 dollars ea, plus ship of
> > > course. Thinking...
> >
> > I would be astonished if there isn
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 13:39:37 andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 18:26, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > So that would translate to around 8 dollars ea, plus ship of course.
> > Thinking...
>
> I would be astonished if there isn't a more local source.
>
> But, if you do decide to import from the
On 30 Mar 2016, at 18:39, andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 18:26, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> So that would translate to around 8 dollars ea, plus ship of course.
>> Thinking...
>
> I would be astonished if there isn't a more local source.
>
> But, if you do decide to import from the UK you c
On 30 March 2016 at 18:26, Gene Heskett wrote:
> So that would translate to around 8 dollars ea, plus ship of course.
> Thinking...
I would be astonished if there isn't a more local source.
But, if you do decide to import from the UK you can probably knock 20%
VAT off the price, and might want t
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 13:02:07 andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Collets/ER-Collet-Nuts-Wren
> >>che s-and-Spanners/ER-Collet-Nuts-with-Ball-Bearing-Type-A
> >
> > Priced in Euro's I assume?
>
> No, those are £ sign
On 30 March 2016 at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Collets/ER-Collet-Nuts-Wrenche
>>s-and-Spanners/ER-Collet-Nuts-with-Ball-Bearing-Type-A
> Priced in Euro's I assume?
No, those are £ signs.
> it s I don't have an exchange site bookmarked, so
> only a WAG
The machine had an OEM license that is not transferable to the new
owner. The OEM is no longer in business so to get updates etc it takes
a new individual license. If the computer or disk drive die you may
have no backup. Probably I could use it for some time and wait to
purchase the license
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 09:32:31 Ken Strauss wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 8:06 AM
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] G33.1 in a peck loop
> >
> > On Wednesday 30 Marc
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 08:31:38 Marcus Bowman wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2016, at 13:05, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 March 2016 07:45:11 andy pugh wrote:
> >> On 30 March 2016 at 12:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> The one I liked the looks of would be $214 for the full size range
> >>> set.
Usefulness? Maybe not with a machine tool because I can buy a TB6600 based
controller on eBay for $10 shipped. But for my robot motors I care a LOT
about weight, power and volume.
Typically one 16-bit uP on a 1.25" x .75" PCB can read two encoders,
control two motors with PID algorithm and accep
On 30 March 2016 at 17:07, wrote:
> I can say that under Mach3 with the XHC handwheel, I noticed that if the
> machine was set with high accelerations for 3D carving, it vibrated a lot
> with the handwheel at low step distances. It aggressively accelerated through
> a step and came to an equal
On 9 February 2016 at 11:23, andy pugh wrote:
> This is where things get iffy. Imagine that I have the 2-terminal
> dongle plugged into a laptop. What do I use for a gnd? Stuff a wire
> down the side of the USB connector? trap the wire in the hinge? :-)
In the end, I fitted a different VFD which
I can say that under Mach3 with the XHC handwheel, I noticed that if the
machine was set with high accelerations for 3D carving, it vibrated a lot with
the handwheel at low step distances. It aggressively accelerated through a step
and came to an equally aggressive stop for a very small move. R
On 03/30/2016 02:06 AM, Danny Miller wrote:
> OK, but if DEFAULT_VELOCITY is the initial slider position, what's
> DEFAULT_ACCELERATION? There's no slider for it, thus no way to change it.
>
>
I believe there may be a way to change it, but it would need
some custom HAL code. I know some discussi
I could confirm micro controller PWM units are by no surprise good stepper
generators. Toggle times may be transferred by DMA which reduce CPU load at the
same time as flanks are placed by the accuracy of the oscillator frequency. I
can't imagine there is any point to do better and even this is
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 8:06 AM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] G33.1 in a peck loop
>
> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 07:45:11 andy pugh wrote:
>
> > On 30 March 2016 at 12:31, Ge
On 30 Mar 2016, at 13:05, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 07:45:11 andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On 30 March 2016 at 12:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> The one I liked the looks of would be $214 for the full size range
>>> set.
>>
>> How many taps do you have? You only need one collet per
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 07:45:11 andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 12:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The one I liked the looks of would be $214 for the full size range
> > set.
>
> How many taps do you have? You only need one collet per tap.
>
I have 0-80 to 1/2" npt, in both imperial and me
On 30 March 2016 at 12:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The one I liked the looks of would be $214 for the full size range set.
How many taps do you have? You only need one collet per tap.
> And I note that some come with the note that the ER20 nut should be
> replaced with a special high grip version.
On Wednesday 30 March 2016 03:36:39 Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 29.03.16 10:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Just one of my "war stories" folks.
> >
> > I hope everyone enjoyed the reason for Easter.
>
> Very much did in the past, but the amines in chocolate give crippling
> kidney pain now. It still
On 30 March 2016 at 08:00, Danny Miller wrote:
> Huh... XHC jogging doesn't work for the unlinked Y or Z axes though.
It's a non-trivial kinematics / World-mode limitation, nothing to do
with linked axes as such.
> Yes I do have independent homing switches to avoid the "racking" problem.
joints
On 30 March 2016 at 08:06, Danny Miller wrote:
> OK, but if DEFAULT_VELOCITY is the initial slider position, what's
> DEFAULT_ACCELERATION? There's no slider for it, thus no way to change it.
They have similar names despite the fact that they are different things.
You could probably argue that D
On 29.03.16 10:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Just one of my "war stories" folks.
>
> I hope everyone enjoyed the reason for Easter.
Very much did in the past, but the amines in chocolate give crippling
kidney pain now. It still smells good, though.
And if there were an afterlife, I'd go where they h
OK, but if DEFAULT_VELOCITY is the initial slider position, what's
DEFAULT_ACCELERATION? There's no slider for it, thus no way to change it.
Danny
On 3/28/2016 12:01 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 10:34 AM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
>> Shoot- you're right, I changed that!
>>
>> Could yo
Huh... XHC jogging doesn't work for the unlinked Y or Z axes though.
Yes I do have independent homing switches to avoid the "racking" problem.
The gantry moves just find with G-codes and keyboard jog and +/- in
World Mode. I'm confused how XHC could be any different.
Danny
On 3/29/2016 4:49 A
29 matches
Mail list logo