Re: [Emc-users] Some odd things

2009-02-19 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Jon Elson wrote: > I recently wanted to check the latency numbers, and ran into this when I > tried to run latency-test : > > ./latency-test: line 136: halrun: command not found Has been commented on several months ago. A fix requires the setting of PATH to include

Re: [Emc-users] CAN-Bus drivers

2009-02-07 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 07 February 2009, Thomas Kaiser wrote: > you can find a CAN PCI card for your PC. The question is if there is a > drive available which works with Linux There are several drivers available for use with Linux (and a few with realtime Linux) - Most of the code I have relates to SJA1000

Re: [Emc-users] pagesides

2009-02-06 Thread paul_c
On Friday 06 February 2009, John Thornton wrote: > I didn't see \papersides in any of the preambles nor could I find > Documents/Settings/Pagelayout... > We are still using Lyx 1.3.7 are you refering to a newer version? I have LyX 1.5.5 installed here. > I tried adding \papersides to the preamble

Re: [Emc-users] How to turn the spindle / coolant on to resumeafter program stop ? (Alex Joni might know about this)

2009-02-05 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 05 February 2009, John Thornton wrote: > It looks like the page numbering is some random mix... we use lyx to create > the docs as well as some custom things to create the html's. I took a quick > look and didn't find a way to specifiy where the page numbers should be... Change \papers

Re: [Emc-users] EMC Board Election Results

2009-02-05 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 05 February 2009, Michael Cornelius wrote: > With 1047 ballots distributed and 97 returned, the result of the voting > is as follows: Thank you Michael for your efforts in conducting a survey in fair and neutral manner. However, you have been provided with an incomplete list for the

Re: [Emc-users] Telnet Interface Questions

2009-01-12 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Leslie Newell wrote: > A much more likely scenario is a malicious user trying to mess around > with a CNC machine that is on the same local network. Or it could be a curious login user - For anyone interested in system security and stability, try poing a few hal variabl

Re: [Emc-users] FW: Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-11 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 11 January 2009, AKSYS Tech Pty Ltd wrote: > Just a quick update.  I did as paul_c suggested and removed the queue > type from the *.nml file. This seems to have fixed my issue, and I now > seem to have error reporting coming back into my micro.  I can see where > Alex is com

Re: [Emc-users] New cutter compensation algorithm in TRUNK

2009-01-11 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Chris Radek wrote: >  Please send a patch that makes it build without warnings >  You can send it to emc-developers or to me personally. Restore my CVS access, and you won't need to mess with "patches". ---

Re: [Emc-users] New cutter compensation algorithm in TRUNK

2009-01-10 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Chris Radek wrote: > Today I merged my cutter compensation work.  The new algorithm > handles concave corners and is not picky about entry moves. You need to include cstdlib & cstring headers in interp_queue.cc and then it will at least compile with gcc-4.3.

Re: [Emc-users] Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-10 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Alex Joni wrote: > > Remove the 'queue' type from the emcError buffer line in your *.nml > > config. > > Removing the 'queue' type might lead to problems, as more than one error > messages won't get stored. > Any subsequent error messages will overwrite existing ones in

Re: [Emc-users] Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-10 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Leslie Newell wrote: > The problem is that the messages are deleted once they have been read. > In most cases the GUI will get the messages because it is polling them > quite frequently. By the time emcrsh gets there they have been swallowed > by the gui. > > Unfortunat

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-09 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Alex Joni wrote: > NML is the mechanism which is used for defining the dataset and > communication paths between the various userspace components. > If you look at the (slightly outdated) overview of EMC: > * there were (every couple of years) talks about replacing it

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-08 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > For my use and for (as far as I can tell), almost everyone else, it is > unnecessary. NML describes the data structures as well as the methods for transmitting the PODs to the various parts of EMC - *Everyone* uses it. Even within the task pla

Re: [Emc-users] Software question

2009-01-08 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > NML is used because it supports an environment where functions are split > across multiple machines. > > I don't know how widely that functionality is used, though. As far as > I'm concerned, it adds an unnecessary level of complexity. Please d

Re: [Emc-users] info on emcsvr

2009-01-04 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Jeff Epler wrote: > The source code to 'emcsvr' is ./src/emc/task/emcsvr.cc Correct - It also uses a number of classes from libnml (or rcslib for EMC1). > Its function is to manage the lifetime of the nml shared memory segments > used by various parts of emc (gui, mil

Re: [Emc-users] EMC1 ?

2009-01-03 Thread paul_c
On Friday 02 January 2009, Richard F. Amaral wrote: > I'd like to know where I can get the public domain version of EMC? Is   > it available on a cvs server like cvs.linuxcnc.org? If so, please   > provide name of branch/tag etc. cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@emc.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/emc login

Re: [Emc-users] Ethernet, rtai, and rtnet

2008-12-29 Thread paul_c
On Monday 29 December 2008, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > The rtnet front page claims they provide a POSIX > socket API, but I was unable to find out if they support SOCK_RAW. ChangeLog: 0.9.6 - added support for SOCK_RAW packet sockets Grepping the rtnet sources, I see two

Re: [Emc-users] end of program

2008-12-17 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 17 December 2008, Ray Henry wrote: > (1) What you are describing was addressed when an attempt was made to > allow integrators the ability to set these behaviors by parameter > changes.  I've argued for such things for years and a first stab at it > was made by Keith Rumley about three

Re: [Emc-users] Anyone have EMC2 running on OSX?

2008-11-10 Thread paul_c
Hi George On Sunday 19 October 2008, George Lawrence Storm wrote: > Before I have to jump through a number of hoops, does anyone have EMC2   > running on any version of OSX? Not emc2, no. But I've just compiled some code and got a GUI and supporting libraries running (on 10.4) - The middle laye

Re: [Emc-users] No version for "nano2count" found

2008-10-04 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 02 October 2008, Евгений Александрович wrote: > rtapi: No version for "nano2count" found: kernel tained. > > Is it problem or just information message? > If it is a problem, what could be wrong? It is a compile time problem that is easily solved - What kernel & RTAI versions are you u

Re: [Emc-users] Problem on EMC2 starting with rtai_hall.ko

2008-10-04 Thread paul_c
Hi Evgeny On Thursday 25 September 2008, Евгений Александрович wrote: > > sounds like rtai is already loaded. Either you compiled it into the > > kernel, not as a module. > What do you mean. Did I somesing worng in kernel? It is impossible to "compile rtai_hal" in to the kernel - The Makefile a

Re: [Emc-users] Back on Ubuntu 8.04 + EMC2 Problems

2008-09-24 Thread paul_c
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Alex Joni wrote: > That is correct. 2.6.24-16-rtai is the latest available. It is usually such > a big pain to build a working -rt version that works on as many PCs as > possible, Rubbish, perpeptuating the myth that compiling kernels is some black art.. Very few con

Re: [Emc-users] Arduino with Ubuntu 8.04

2008-09-21 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Dirk wrote: > If you are lucky you can use the debian way of compiling   > kernels. This will solve dependency's too. Try: apt-get install kernel- > kpkg" this will install all stuff needed to compile your own kernel in   > a nice .deb package. That should be kernel-pa

Re: [Emc-users] New error after upgrade

2008-09-13 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 13 September 2008, Alex Joni wrote: > Sure, it's always been open for review/comment, though we should move this > to the emc-devel list, Still awaiting answers to other questions on the dev list, so does it really make a difference where the topic is raised ? ---

Re: [Emc-users] New error after upgrade

2008-09-12 Thread paul_c
Alex On Thursday 11 September 2008, Alex Joni wrote: > I get the error your pastebin shows when I try to load probe_parport more > than one time. Attempting to load a module more than once should result in -EEXIST being returned. If you are getting as far as triggering a call trace, then there

Re: [Emc-users] New error after upgrade

2008-09-11 Thread paul_c
Alex On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Alex Joni wrote: > the culprit might be probe_parport, can you check if parport_pc shows up > under lsmod (right after booting the machine, then after running emc2), and > if you have loadrt probe_parport in your hal file. Indeed, probe_parport is the offendi

Re: [Emc-users] New error after upgrade

2008-09-10 Thread paul_c
Hi Steve On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Steve Blackmore wrote: > Thanks Paul - I do have the modules If anybody needs them, Thanks, but no - You get to keep all the broken pieces ;-) > what's the next course of action? Is it something I've done or an error in > the updates somewhere? It is no

Re: [Emc-users] New error after upgrade

2008-09-10 Thread paul_c
Alex On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Alex Joni wrote: > can you post a list of modules loaded? You don't need a list of loaded modules to diagnose the problem (actually, there are two). > From: "Steve Blackmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [ 6204.322690] Pid: 5635, comm: insmod Tainted: GF       2.6

Re: [Emc-users] Stepper configuration

2008-08-13 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, John Kasunich wrote: > Unfortunately, conversion from clocks to time is non-trivial, so we > simply report the results in clocks. (get_cycles()*10^6)/cpu_khz Is that non-trivial ?? > The situation is getting worse, not better.  In the name of "progress", we > now hav

Re: [Emc-users] Stepper configuration

2008-08-12 Thread paul_c
Hi Sebastian On Tuesday 12 August 2008, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > Hm, looks like rt_spin_lock() and friends are not exported through rtapi. Why would you want rtapi functions for spinlocks ? > It looks like it would be easy to add a bunch of functions (or maybe > preprocessor macros) to call

Re: [Emc-users] Stepper configuration

2008-08-10 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 10 August 2008, Matt Shaver wrote: > 1b. I can't help but think that there is (buried under the IDE) a command > line VHDL>bit-image compiler. Command line interface is trivial enough to allow non-interactive builds.. e.g.: #! /bin/bash xst -ifn ${project}.xst -ofn ${project}.syr ngdbui

Re: [Emc-users] Disabling Sound for Increased performance.

2008-07-29 Thread paul_c
Hi Dan On Friday 25 July 2008, Organic Engines wrote: >   After a whole bunch of thought it occurred to me that sound is > essentially real time and probably a resource hog. I'd suggest using tools like top or htop to profile the system in order to identify the resource hogs - Sound doesn't con

Re: [Emc-users] Data Types

2008-06-08 Thread paul_c
Thanks for taking the time to reply Ken. On Sunday 08 June 2008, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > I've changed the subject of this to better reflect what it is about, and > am responding on both users and developers lists so that the original > audience will still see it. Noted - See below as to why it i

Re: [Emc-users] Putting Encoder on AC servomotor???

2008-06-07 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 05 June 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > We've discussed various methods of handling larger data types, which > this would require. I don't recall ever seeing any discusssion about the usage of "data types".. > The good news is that once we have that, we can use > doubles anywhere

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-27 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote: > Yes, congratulations, you found a network that blocks ssh, one of the > most commonly used protocols on the internet.  If you try, you can > find one that blocks all web access on port 80 too. *cough* Corporate networks *cough* secure systems *cough*. An

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-25 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote: > > > Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine? > > Yes > No you can't.  Sourceforge disallows it.  You must not have actually > tried. Oh shucks - Must have been another machine I was logged in to yesterday. With ten or more consoles open at any on

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-25 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 25 May 2008, paul_c wrote: > The external IP address should be in the 84.9.xx.xx block, but I'm not on a > static IP, so it will change. Update, 87.74.xx.xx today - Might be something else after lunch. ---

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-25 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote: > > Using a remote server that I have a shell account on... > > ssh: connect to host cvs.linuxcnc.org port 22: Connection refused > > Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine? Yes, and I can also run cvs to do anon checkouts from other systems. Log

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-24 Thread paul_c
On Friday 23 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote: > You seem to be the only one who is unable to connect to the server for > anonymous read-only access.  Of course no key is required for that. Using a remote server that I have a shell account on... -bash-3.00$ ssh-keygen -t dsa Generating public/privat

Re: [Emc-users] Who is Paul_c

2008-05-23 Thread paul_c
On Friday 23 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > 1) He was instrumental in getting EMC to where it is today. Perhaps, but then there are other people that deserve credit. Stallman, Torvalds, Mantegazza, Yodakin, not forgetting Proctor, Shackleford, Kramer, and countless others (oh, and Bill

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-23 Thread paul_c
On Friday 23 May 2008, Alex Joni wrote: > If you care about development or development related issues use the > emc-developers mailing list. I have seen some of these guys, even in the same room, huddled over a keyboard or engaged in some trivial discussion whilst a guest speaker is giving a pr

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-23 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote: > I don't have ordinary traceroute installed but there is a "Network > Tools" under the System -> Administration that lets me run quite a > number of these sorts of tools. Switching to a console and running diagnostics from a command line is much easier.

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-23 Thread paul_c
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > I don't have the full list at the moment, and it's unnecessary. You mean to say you have no idea who has access - As a supposed project admin & "board member", that is a very sad state of affairs... But thanks to Chris, we now know. Only 24

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-22 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > email them to a developer for review and possible inclusion.   Please provide a full list of "developers" who have access to the repository. --- Paul. - This SF.ne

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-21 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote: > Pinging it _with_ the http is NOT going to work.  You ping hosts, not > services.  "http://"; is a URL, not a hostname.  Paul has been around > long enough to be well aware of that. > Pinging _with_ the http:// is doomed to fail, which I'm sure Paul

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-21 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote: > EVERYONE has anonymous read access: > http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/ `ping http://cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Fail `traceroute cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Stops somewhere in the alltel.net system. `cvs -z5 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co emc2` - Connection times out

Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing

2008-05-20 Thread paul_c
To add to the history lesson... On Saturday 17 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote: > The BDI evolved out of an early discussion that we came to call a > Brain Dead Install when the EMC was still a part of NIST.  It's > difficult to imagine now how much trouble it was to get a running > version of the EMC

Re: [Emc-users] EMC with Galil Ethernet motion controller

2008-03-22 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 22 March 2008 14:31, Thomas J Powderly wrote: > EMC is a controller > DMC40xx is a controller and emc2 is ?? > there was code, a long time ago that allowed a similar controller > ( PMAC) to control a machine, with EMC as only the 'user interface' > but that code would need major modif

[Emc-users] EMC history

2008-02-13 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 15:40, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > >I'm starting to suspect that EMC is a project that started out, not to > > emulate the commercial equivalents, but built bit by bit to do various > > things on the cheap, I'm starting to suspect that EMC is not a realtime > > machi

Re: [Emc-users] Running on a G4 MAc (new world)

2008-02-11 Thread paul_c
Hi Jason On Monday 11 February 2008 07:45, Jason Cox wrote: > Paul, > I am about ready to start on the mac port :) > I am trying to decide onwhich way to go. > > 1. install xcode and try to get rtai to work on a 10.4 10.5 kernel. I > have done a bit of digging into this and havent had

Re: [Emc-users] Running on a G4 MAc (new world)

2008-02-11 Thread paul_c
Hi Jason On Monday 11 February 2008 10:19, Jason Cox wrote: > Ok i will move over to the Dev list. Keep it here. Dev list is ... > Alex, was this a "roll you own" linux distro that you were using? What i > have is a G4 (gray case) UP with 1G ram so it should do ok. I seem to be > seeing a lot a

Re: [Emc-users] Running on a G4 MAc (new world)

2008-02-06 Thread paul_c
Hi Jason On Wednesday 06 February 2008 02:59, Jason Cox wrote: > As i started this thread, i should put my hand up, but there are a few > problems at the moment. I have just started uni (after 10 years) and I > would need a guide for setting up a development environment on OSX. All you need is x

Re: [Emc-users] Running on a G4 MAc (new world)

2008-02-05 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 03 February 2008 05:35, Jason Cox wrote: > as luck would have it, I was given recently an old G4 Mac. is it posible > to run EMC on a ppc32? After proding a few people I know, some feedback.. The core library, libnml compiles and appears to be functioning when linked to the test suite.

Re: [Emc-users] Running on a G4 MAc (new world)

2008-02-03 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 03 February 2008 20:31, Jon Elson wrote: > > I was given recently an old G4 Mac. is it posible to run EMC on a ppc32? > Does it have a parallel port?  If not, you are in pretty serious > trouble. The right question should be: Does it have any expansion slots that would allow an IO card

Re: [Emc-users] Dual Linux EMC Installation on Dual HDDs

2008-01-30 Thread paul_c
On Monday 28 January 2008 21:39, John Kasunich wrote: > I don't know what system Paul is getting 1000+ warnings or errors on. Has it crossed your mind to ask ?? FYI: Debian: stable. Kernel: 2.6.23.11 RTAI: 3.6 Hardware: Assorted - single & dual processor, mixture of speeds. > Breezy wit

Re: [Emc-users] Dual Linux EMC Installation on Dual HDDs

2008-01-28 Thread paul_c
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 03:35, Rafael Skodlar wrote: > pmark wrote: > > Good Day - Have been working on the trying to install Fresh Dual > > Installation w/2HDD's one for Ubuntu EMC2 & one for Linux BDI EMC and the > > being able to choose the OS on BOOT. Would like to have both EMC's > > availa

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

2007-11-29 Thread paul_c
Hi Ray On Thursday 29 November 2007 17:53, Ray Henry wrote: > I find this fascinating.  Long years ago after some preliminary work by > Will at NIST, I authored a knoppix-emc CD and worked with Paul while > developing the Morphix (take the red pill) version that became the > debian BDI.  A couple

Re: [Emc-users] Is updating EMC@ impossible without internet?

2007-11-14 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 18:24, Jon Elson wrote: > xtra209 wrote: > > Updating emc2 seems impossible without an internet connection on the > > machine. Is this true? True - Either to download packages, or CD images. > > So far the only way I have successfully updated emc2 is to wait for the

Re: [Emc-users] EMC on DSL

2007-09-02 Thread paul_c
Hi Roland On Saturday 01 September 2007 14:53, Roland Jollivet wrote: > Quick question; > Can Emc be loaded onto  a machine with DSL (Damn Small Linux) ? DSL is Debian based - You will find both patched kernel packages and RTAI available from several unofficial repositories (if you need the uri

Re: [Emc-users] Just a Thought

2007-08-16 Thread paul_c
Hi Ray On Tuesday 14 August 2007 15:45, Ray Henry wrote: > There was a heated discussion at that long ago FEST meeting in Ann Arbor > when we created the EMC board.  It was related to it's (us) becoming a > legal entity. Outside of the USA, any "entity" would have little, if any power or status.

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 and kernel 2.6.20

2007-08-03 Thread paul_c
On Friday 03 August 2007 19:46, Jeff Epler wrote: > http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/emc2/src/rtapi/rtai_rtapi.c.diff?r1=1.34;r2=1.35 wget 'http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/emc2/src/rtapi/rtai_rtapi.c.diff?r1=1.34;r2=1.35' --20:40:43-- http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/emc2/src/rtapi/rtai_rtapi.c.diff?r1=1.34

Re: [Emc-users] emc2 and kernel 2.6.20

2007-08-03 Thread paul_c
Attached, configure & make logs for emc2-2.1.7 released on July 30th. config.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data make.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Sti

Re: [Emc-users] SECONDED: Ray Henry

2007-08-01 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 14:47, John Kasunich wrote: > John Kasunich wrote: > > (off-list) > Not. > crap. Thankyou John for nailing your colours to the mast for ... and all others to see. Somehow, I doubt if it was really an error. Despite that, my offer of help as a (co?)developer still sta

Re: [Emc-users] Modbus

2007-08-01 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 01:37, Matthew Glenn Shaver wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:36 -0700, Kirk Wallace wrote: > > I just got a VFD with a Modbus port. Is there a plan on getting EMC to > > use Modbus? > Python has a good serial communication library, so it looks possible. Matt - Before

Re: [Emc-users] SECONDED: Ray Henry

2007-08-01 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 02:43, Ray Henry wrote: > Thank you both for the nomination and second but I must decline. The experience, maturity, and respect that you brought to the table will be sorely missed. Hopefully, you will still be somewhere in the background to keep these guys in check w

Re: [Emc-users] Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd

2007-08-01 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 02:01, Jon Elson wrote: > > The key you send to cradek to gain access to the CVS server is your > > PUBLIC key! > Why Paul Corner is claiming this is such a hideous vulnerablility is just > totally beyond me! Jon - Get the attribution correct before posting. I NEVER ME

Re: [Emc-users] elections

2007-07-31 Thread paul_c
Stephen On Tuesday 31 July 2007 01:24, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > At the moment, I think we believe that the design of EMC2 is applicable in > an industrial setting. I don't even trust it to run a hobby spec mill such as a Sherline let alone some of the heavy iron I have. Running in an indus

Re: [Emc-users] Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd

2007-07-31 Thread paul_c
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 02:19, Ray Henry wrote: > >  The move was made without consultation or due process. > > IRC meeting, April, 2006 >         "The Sourceforge CVS system has experienced troubles on >         2006-03-30, and after a few days it still wasn't looking bright >         for a fast f

Re: [Emc-users] Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd

2007-07-30 Thread paul_c
On Monday 30 July 2007 17:59, Mark Pictor wrote: > For the record, Paul was given the opportunity to get access to the > new repository -- the same way anyone else gets access. No Mark - You miss the point entirely. The move was made without consultation or due process. As a result, the project

Re: [Emc-users] Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd

2007-07-30 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 17:07, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > Paul - do you know of any way to use the kernel firmware infrastructure > to load different firmware sets into multiple cards? Stephen - If/when you get elected to the "board" and succeed in restoring the CVS repository at Sourceforge

Re: [Emc-users] Board Seats

2007-07-28 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 20:14, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > The board is distinct from the developers.  The board is there to make > decisions that affect the direction of development (do we deviate from > the RS274NGC spec, do we add features for 23-axis machines ...), > decisions about things

Re: [Emc-users] Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd

2007-05-02 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 17:07, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > Paul - do you know of any way to use the kernel firmware infrastructure > to load different firmware sets into multiple cards?  I know the current > method of embedding the firmware in the HAL driver doesn't support that > either, but th

Re: [Emc-users] Help sought to modify hostmotXX.vhd

2007-05-02 Thread paul_c
Hi Seb On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:39, Seb James wrote: > Mesa 5i20 board which provides 2 axes of servo/encoder control, 31 > channels of logic input and 29 channels of logic output. Nothing too dificult there - IO is currently defined as 24 bits in at most, half a dozen places. Mapping the in

Re: [Emc-users] Hard disk space

2007-03-30 Thread paul_c
On Friday 30 March 2007 07:00, David A. Frantz wrote: > Games can come or go but if the time comes that one needs to trim the > space on the CD I would hope that the office programs stayed around for > a bit.   There are numerous uses for "office" apps in the modern shop. One of the problems with

Re: [Emc-users] Another Look at SPI

2007-03-28 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 23:18, Kirk Wallace wrote: > I just wanted a simple SPI device to talk to, but also have something > useful when my lathe grows up. > > That being said, once you got the bit-banging driver worked out it would > > be useful for many applications. > I did find this driver

Re: [Emc-users] Minefields and...

2007-03-17 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 17 March 2007 03:29, Matthew Glenn Shaver wrote: > OK, that I didn't know. The original copyright header says: > > # Copyright (C) 1991-2006 Altera Corporation > # Your use of Altera Corporation's design tools, logic functions > # and other software and tools, Note " Altera Corporation

Re: [Emc-users] Minefields and...

2007-03-16 Thread paul_c
On Friday 16 March 2007 18:17, Ray Henry wrote: > I suggest that we let Paul do the audit and we keep working on > abilities. Buck. Passing ? On Friday 16 March 2007 18:44, Matthew Glenn Shaver wrote: > > src/hal/drivers/pluto_servo_firmware/pluto_servo.qsf > GPL - Header at the top of the file.

Re: [Emc-users] Another Potential User - I Wonder If He Subscribes?

2007-03-16 Thread paul_c
On Friday 16 March 2007 14:10, John Kasunich wrote: > Accusing EMC2 of containing non-GPL code without pointing to the > specific files in question is a perfect example of FUD. Fer... You want to be able to make these claims, then I suggest you start conducting regular audits. A small selection,

Re: [Emc-users] Another Potential User - I Wonder If He Subscribes?

2007-03-16 Thread paul_c
On Friday 16 March 2007 03:44, Jon Elson wrote: > On Thursday 15 March 2007 19:01, Dale wrote: > >You can email me directly if you care to expand on what "FUD" means. > Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt -- something naysayers spread to disparage > something they don't want to succeed. A cudgel used to den

Re: [Emc-users] EMC2 unistall

2007-03-12 Thread paul_c
On Monday 12 March 2007 12:09, Alex Joni wrote: > Unfortunately at the moment there is no way to uninstall automatically. If > you think that is needed, please add a feature request No Alex, it is not a feature, it is a bug. The `uninstall` target is a perfectly reasonable function of any build s

Re: [Emc-users] RTAI refusing to compile

2007-03-01 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 21:50, Marc van Doornik wrote: > Initially I just downloaded rtai-3.2 and a vanilla 2.4.27 kernel. Compile > kernel, no problem. Very old combination - If you *really* want 2.4.27 patched with RTAI, I may have an old prebuilt Debian package lurking somewhere... > Af

Re: [Emc-users] 5i20 step generators

2007-02-15 Thread paul_c
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At present, EMC has a driver (by PeteV) that supports a single > > configuration. That one config is stored as part of the EMC source code, > > in both VHDL and binery form - binary because most people don't have the > > Xilinx software installed, an

Re: [Emc-users] Qt3 lib and dro

2007-01-04 Thread paul_c
Hi James On Thursday 04 January 2007 00:39, James Reed wrote: >  Now, what do I do with it?  I'm very new at EMC, Linux, and even Qt3, (I'm >  more familiar with Qt3 than the others, though). You may do what ever you wish with the sources as long as you (or anyone else) do not claim copyright a

Re: [Emc-users] Qt3 lib and dro

2007-01-03 Thread paul_c
Hi Ray On Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:50, Ray Henry wrote: > There is a way around it if we find that Paul successfully raises the > proprietary flag with the work that I encouraged him to do with qt3. You misjudge me - The point I was trying to get across was that the code in question has NOT

Re: [Emc-users] parallel port initializing

2007-01-03 Thread paul_c
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 02:17, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > There was a little bit of work done on a Qt<->NML interface a couple of > years ago.  It never went too far, but strangely enough, the "demo app" > is a DRO :) The core code is being used in a couple of applications. > I'll dig it

Re: [Emc-users] trying to install umbuntu

2006-11-30 Thread paul_c
Hi Alex On Thursday 30 November 2006 15:55, alex wrote: > But I think you should find a more reliable way of disttributing emc - > ubuntu doesn't seem to be an answer - too hard for a novice user like me. For a long while, there has been the BDI disk (based on Debian's stable branch, Sarge) - T

Re: [Emc-users] Using emc2 with touchscreen

2006-11-17 Thread paul_c
On Friday 17 November 2006 00:29, Kasey Matejcek wrote: > I've been using a touchscreen for a year now > Just set it up under the X windows setup as and input device does every > thing the same as the mouse Been using microtouch and magictouch screens here for years - Aside from having to write a