On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:40:23 +0100, you wrote:
>
>Le 2013-11-28 03:55, a k a écrit :
>> how to convert STL file into other useful format?
>>
>
>I know several tools able to do that:
>- CamBam
>- Deskproto
>- BobCAD-CAM
>- Mecsoft FreeMill
>- Vectric Cut3D
Problem with a lot of 3D scanner produced
On 11/28/2013 3:29 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> How about free?
> http://www.123dapp.com/catch
>
> (note, I haven't actually got this to work on my phone)
Still no Android version.
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they
Le 2013-11-28 03:55, a k a écrit :
> how to convert STL file into other useful format?
>
I know several tools able to do that:
- CamBam
- Deskproto
- BobCAD-CAM
- Mecsoft FreeMill
- Vectric Cut3D
CamBam is not able to handle four axis easily (you can do indexed, but
that is tricky), but the pri
How about free?
http://www.123dapp.com/catch
(note, I haven't actually got this to work on my phone)
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before
On 11/27/2013 8:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 November 2013 22:24:46 a k did opine:
>
>> hi
>> i found new 3d scanner http://cubify.com/sense/
>> problem is that file output STL from that scanner.
>
> That is not its only problem, very low resolution, 240 wide by 320 high is
> the re
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 22:24:46 a k did opine:
> hi
> i found new 3d scanner http://cubify.com/sense/
> problem is that file output STL from that scanner.
That is not its only problem, very low resolution, 240 wide by 320 high is
the real turnoff for me. That is only very slightly better
hi
i found new 3d scanner http://cubify.com/sense/
problem is that file output STL from that scanner.
i know that ---Synergy does not have surface cutting routines for STL
objects.
my cad/cam is weber sys.
how to convert STL file into other useful format?
does MasterCam able to use STL model to ge
On 13 June 2013 17:20, Ted Hyde wrote:
> One of the biggest challenges I've had with the arm is mounting - I've
> sat in on demos (since Faro is about an hour north of me), and I see
> them pulling out a tripod and hitting dead-zero bulls-eyes every time.
I have mapped out locations of acellerom
On 6/13/2013 11:02 AM, emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> boeing and lockheed only buy off on the iges files , protocol demands they
> be checked against the iges file period . not a " good master" the reason
> being is a good master is simply a part that is "in tolerance " and stacku
I consider myself a comfortable coder, but
even I wouldn't want the task of that - I'd rather have a series of
"golden samples" each stage along the way just to do direct comparisons to.
boeing and lockheed only buy off on the iges files , protocol demands they
be checked against the iges file
My point about scanning multiple "known good masters" was that Aram's
stated intent was to correct machining [on the fly] - an Iges (or any
other neutral format) from a modeler would [typically] give you the
intended finished part, not something partially complete. I'm following
this up more as
the above mentioned faro arm compares the product to the iges file and
verifies . these are nice the one i used was 17000 out of the box . they
are absolutely necessary for 5 axis swarfed surfaces on airframe parts . as
to point cloud to parametric solid i have no idea how to do that so i will
take
On 12 June 2013 17:15, John Alexander Stewart wrote:
>> Going from a point-cloud to a parametric solid is not even slightly easy.
> It's not that hard. In my Android App (for instance) I take STL vertices,
> group them, then recreate triangles; it makes rendering much faster, and
> lighting/text
Andy;
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> Going from a point-cloud to a parametric solid is not even slightly easy.
>
It's not that hard. In my Android App (for instance) I take STL vertices,
group them, then recreate triangles; it makes rendering much faster, and
lighting/text
I'm interested in whether you could use a leap for this.
https://leapmotion.com/product
I am still trying to get ahold of one :-)
DougM
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Watier Yves wrote:
> HI,
>
> My 2ct, when I tried 2 years ago to have a reliable 3d scanner for
> cheap, I tried the line
On 12 June 2013 13:52, jeremy youngs wrote:
> not exactly just compare it to an iges file that will never change . or
> other parametric solid
Going from a point-cloud to a parametric solid is not even slightly easy.
However, in this case I guess that you could create a virtual
point-cloud from
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Stevenson [mailto:stus...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:05 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 3d scanner
>
> this is what we need to be working toward :)
>
> http://
this is what we need to be working toward :)
http://www.faro.com/en-us/products/metrology/measuring-arm-faro-scanarm/overview
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:53 AM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> sorry sent before finished , i agree with all of the other statements
> though
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8
sorry sent before finished , i agree with all of the other statements
though
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:52 AM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> ted said
>
> Even if it did, one would have to scan a "known-good-master" at each
> step of the production for the test scan to reference against. If you
> want
ted said
Even if it did, one would have to scan a "known-good-master" at each
step of the production for the test scan to reference against. If you
want accuracy, measuring scale on a single volumetric scan is near
impossible. You need to have many angles and views stitched together to
see past o
In regards to a depth sensor, there's a good change Aram is referring to
a Kinect or the Asus Xtion (Pro Live). There's been plenty of
hacker-friendly attempts for "point-n-shoot" capture solutions using
these over the years, adding to the laser-line, and distributed-light
methods. The Xtion un
HI,
My 2ct, when I tried 2 years ago to have a reliable 3d scanner for
cheap, I tried the line laser option, cost nothing (a laser line is 5$
on ebay, and I recycle a good webcam).
My conclusion were that the raw scan need a lot of cleaning before
having anything useful for milling.
Maybe it impro
--- On Tue, 6/11/13, a k wrote:
> i want to talk about 3d laser scanner.
> this is new technology that can be add to EMC2
> Big picture is to generate "intelligent" milling machine
> machine tool.
> With 3d scanner machine tool can see inspect part that it
> cutting, analyze make correction and r
Can you point us to such a $500 depth sensor?.
Thanks,
Javier
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:34 AM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> why not just probe check the technology is already mature. not tryin to
> disuade just sayin i mean if you are developing it great please share
> in the wiki
>
>
>
> On
why not just probe check the technology is already mature. not tryin to
disuade just sayin i mean if you are developing it great please share
in the wiki
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:53 PM, a k wrote:
> Hi
> i want to talk about 3d laser scanner.
> this is new technology that can be add to
Hi
i want to talk about 3d laser scanner.
this is new technology that can be add to EMC2
Big picture is to generate "intelligent" milling machine machine tool.
With 3d scanner machine tool can see inspect part that it cutting, analyze
make correction and recut,
Depth sensor cost around $500 and re
26 matches
Mail list logo
