Thanks, i'll try that! I'll let you know if this will work. About C code..it's
all blur for me :) > From: bodge...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:50:52 +
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 5 axis kinematics!
>
> On
On 4 December 2012 19:33, alexandru dumitru wrote:
> Thanks for that link Andy but that is to much for me. As i sayd, i'm not
> that good with linux.
That's not Linux, it is C code.
> The point is that my machine has the same kinematics as that vismach max5kins
> machine from my point of vie
> > From: stus...@gmail.com
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 5 axis kinematics!
> >
> > The kinematics may not be wrong. It depends on what the gcode is telling
> > the machine to do.
> >
> > Just saying the kinemati
On 4 December 2012 18:26, alexandru dumitru wrote:
> Thanks for you answer Stuart! I generate my G-code with a generic fanuc 5
> axis post proccesor and it doesn't compensate the tool lenght or the B axis
> pivot point, so i need to incorporate the kinematics in the machine control.
"maxkins"
o all this things. I was looking
into linuxcnc machine examples and one machine from vismach it's almost same
configuration like mine! do you think that will work for me? Alex
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:36:40 -0600
> From: stus...@gmail.com
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
The kinematics may not be wrong. It depends on what the gcode is telling
the machine to do.
Just saying the kinematics is wrong doesn't lead anyone to be able to
understand where your problem is.
A simple post processor will generate gcode that needs the kinematics in
the machine to run a part.
Hello! I am building an 5 axis milling machine similar to this one (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1DCXe9t3UE ) the only diference is that my
machine has the rotary table fixed on the milling table and the other axes are
configured like this ( B axis is the tilting head that is carryed by
On 10 October 2012 08:59, Tomaz T. wrote:
> I would need a little help understanding why I am getting following error on
> axis 8 on my 5 axis machine running 5 axis kinematics.
A common problem with non-trivial kinematics is to omit the
acceleration terms from the [TRAJ] section.
http://www.li
2012/10/10 Tomaz T. :
>
> Hi everyone,
> I would need a little help understanding why I am getting following error on
> axis 8 on my 5 axis machine running 5 axis kinematics. I run ie G43 H1 and
> tool length from tool table is taken and placed for W axis, then I would need
> to make move G0 W0
Hi everyone,
I would need a little help understanding why I am getting following error on
axis 8 on my 5 axis machine running 5 axis kinematics. I run ie G43 H1 and tool
length from tool table is taken and placed for W axis, then I would need to
make move G0 W0 and there following error shows u
re XYZAC tarball unpacking
I also had problems unpacking
it's that the pkg insists on a pre-existing destination
so
i used the ubuntu gui tool 'Archive Manager'
and took the files out one at a time and put them where >I< wanted them
worked great
built the kins no problem, ran the demo no problem,
On 19.05.11 16:12, Rudy du Preez wrote:
> Not finding any other way to upload the XYZACkins that I recently developed,
> I added a small description to the Wiki under HAL user contributed
> components: Kinematics. A link to a tar.gz file is given which contains the
> kinematics code as well as the
2011/5/19 Rudy du Preez :
>
> Comments will be appreciated once you have tried it out. The remaining
> problem I have is the homing and setup to start a job. I am still working on
> a solution.
>
What is wrong with homing?
Viesturs
Not finding any other way to upload the XYZACkins that I recently developed,
I added a small description to the Wiki under HAL user contributed
components: Kinematics. A link to a tar.gz file is given which contains the
kinematics code as well as the ini and hal files, a vismach simulation model
an
14 matches
Mail list logo
