There is a video of a machine placing 0604 parts from tape, and
it seems to work, but there was no info, screen shots or other
indications of what they were doing.
Anyway, my Philips CSM84 works well, but I do miss having the accuracy
of a vision system. If it eventually croaks, it might
On 08/11/13 22:06, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
To be more precise, my pick-and-place machine really looks like a CNC. I
am quite confident that it can be controlled by LinuxCNC. It has old
connectors everywhere.
What I am worried about is the overall software framework on top of
David Armstrong wrote:
have you taken a look at OpenPnP http://openpnp.org
it's written in java and communicates to Linuxcnc
Looks interesting, but I can't see much indication of what they've
accomplished. I browsed the Google group but couldn't see much
there that really showed what they
My impression as well. I found it very difficult to make head or tail
out of what is going on there.
On 2013/11/09 06:34 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
David Armstrong wrote:
have you taken a look at OpenPnP http://openpnp.org
it's written in java and communicates to Linuxcnc
Looks interesting,
Marius Liebenberg wrote:
My impression as well. I found it very difficult to make head or tail
out of what is going on there.
There is a video of a machine placing 0604 parts from tape, and
it seems to work, but there was no info, screen shots or other
indications of what they were doing.
Dear all,
I am new to this list and would like to thank you for your hard work.
Recently, I bought two STM pick and place machines, model Euro Placer
300, a French made pick and place. These are very old models from the
1990s running under DOS.
Surprisingly, the machine is a very good and
To be more precise, my pick-and-place machine really looks like a CNC. I
am quite confident that it can be controlled by LinuxCNC. It has old
connectors everywhere.
What I am worried about is the overall software framework on top of
LinuxCNC. Ideally, I would like to be able to use a high level
On 8 November 2013 22:06, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE jmpo...@gooze.eu wrote:
What I am worried about is the overall software framework on top of
LinuxCNC. Ideally, I would like to be able to use a high level language.
It is possible in principle. G-code it just one way to get motion
commands to
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
What I am worried about is the overall software framework on top of
LinuxCNC. Ideally, I would like to be able to use a high level language.
The big problem with this is error recovery. I have a Philips CSM84, a
similar
tank-like construction machine of
andy pugh wrote:
On 8 November 2013 22:06, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE jmpo...@gooze.eu wrote:
What I am worried about is the overall software framework on top of
LinuxCNC. Ideally, I would like to be able to use a high level language.
It is possible in principle. G-code it just one
10 matches
Mail list logo
