On 01/28/2014 05:01 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> I haven't used it myself, so I am not sure how the
> on-screen display of mm-per-click and the actual
> mm-per-click are sorted out.
Using the ilowpass, you can actually hear the last few
integer steps
come out after you stop moving the MPG. The way I
Thank guys. I completely missed the integer in/out part. I had sort of
figured out it was trying to increase apparent resoution from what Peter
and Jon said and now that makes a lot of sense why. We'll give it a try.
Though, Im now curious as to how a filter will play along w/ the velocity
mode
On 28 January 2014 02:09, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
> Any reason to use them over ilowpass?
No, ilowpass is specifically for the MPG use-case.
The "counts" inputs for wheel jogging are integer. The output of an
MPG is an integer. If the jog speed is set to 1mm per click, then no
matter what you
On 01/27/2014 08:09 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
> We have MPG 'banging' on two machines that are tuned fast and I just found
> the 'ilowpass' example fix online:
> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/examples/mpg.html
>
> Looks to be a FIR filter. I had actually found the 'limit2' and 'limit3'
> functio
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:09:59 -0500
> From: Stephen Dubovsky
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: [Emc-users] MPG ilowpass vs limi
We have MPG 'banging' on two machines that are tuned fast and I just found
the 'ilowpass' example fix online:
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/examples/mpg.html
Looks to be a FIR filter. I had actually found the 'limit2' and 'limit3'
functions first to use as rate limiters when searching. There is
