Looking forward to it.
John
>
> Cleaned it off a bit, John D., so I'll try to get some pix tomorrow.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Genes Web page
On Thursday 03 January 2019 04:41:57 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2019 19:28:29 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 January 2019 14:38:55 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 02 January 2019 11:07:23 Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > >Thank you
On Wednesday 02 January 2019 19:28:29 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2019 14:38:55 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 January 2019 11:07:23 Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > >Thank you Marius. Once again, the conversation has shown me
> > > > other potential
On Wednesday 02 January 2019 14:38:55 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2019 11:07:23 Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >Thank you Marius. Once again, the conversation has shown me other
> > >potential ways to skin this cat. From that, I make progress.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
ven't taken them yet. So keep
nagging me. :)
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> > Sent: January-02-19 3:47 AM
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Emc-users] mach3(winderz) vs LCNC bob useage diffs
&g
On Wednesday 02 January 2019 11:07:23 Marius Liebenberg wrote:
[...]
> >Thank you Marius. Once again, the conversation has shown me other
> >potential ways to skin this cat. From that, I make progress.
> >
> >
> >
> >It's a pleasure and good luck when you do get around to do it. Not so
>
with
MachineKit also has X on pins 2,3.
So I'd rewire it. And still waiting for pictures or did I miss an email?
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> Sent: January-02-19 3:47 AM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-users
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] mach3(winderz) vs LCNC bob useage diffs
On Wednesday 02 January 2019 08:58:27 Marius Liebenberg wrote:
Gene
You can configure Mach3 to drive anything on any output pin. It is up
to the creator of the machine and the BOB that is used.
You can dump the enable
rom that, I make progress.
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Gene Heskett"
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: 2019-01-02 13:46:51
> Subject: [Emc-users] mach3(winderz) vs LCNC bob useage diffs
>
> >Greetings all, PCW in particular;
> >
>
for it.
-- Original Message --
From: "Gene Heskett"
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 2019-01-02 13:46:51
Subject: [Emc-users] mach3(winderz) vs LCNC bob useage diffs
Greetings all, PCW in particular;
Trying to sort a basket of rattlesnakes here. This computer has been
dri
Greetings all, PCW in particular;
Trying to sort a basket of rattlesnakes here. This computer has been
driving an HF micromill, thru the parport, using software stepping since
the early 2000's, thru a variety of actual motherboards.
It seems that mach3 at least, uses pins on a std parport that
I'm going to jump in here. Aram can be hard to communicate with since
English is not his first language; but he is in this country and trying
to make a living. He tries some pretty experimental and imaginative
approaches to solving his customers problems.
On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 07:23 -0500,
Damm evolution: I hit a return and it sent the message
So copy and try again:
I'm going to jump in here. Aram can be hard to communicate with since
English is not his first language; but he is in this country and trying
to make a living. He tries some pretty experimental and imaginative
Send it back, get a refund
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Marius Liebenberg mar...@mastercut.co.za
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] mach3
Your Google is broken
On 2014-07-03 21:54, a k wrote:
hi
i use google
On Saturday 05 July 2014 05:51:58 Alex Joni did opine
And Gene did reply:
Send it back, get a refund
Alex
My thoughts exactly, Aram, Linuxcnc can I believe do anything Mach3 can
do.
First, it only runs on windows, and thats strikes one, two and three
you're out right there.
Cheers, Gene
Hi Gene,
I think that Alex meant to send back the broken Google, not Mach3 ;)
Cheers,
Philipp
On 05.07.2014 13:09, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2014 05:51:58 Alex Joni did opine
And Gene did reply:
Send it back, get a refund
Alex
My thoughts exactly, Aram, Linuxcnc can I
On Saturday 05 July 2014 07:28:02 Philipp Burch did opine
And Gene did reply:
Hi Gene,
I think that Alex meant to send back the broken Google, not Mach3 ;)
Cheers,
Philipp
Chuckle. But either way, the send it back was good advice. Google
seems to be playing with its search
Not sure what Aram is looking for but why is there so many catty remarks
and so much sarcasm. I can think of more than one reason to explore a
different system.
If you just want to put someone down why don't you pick a target that will
fight back. All I see from Aram is questions about what
=mach3+gillette
- Original Message -
From: Philipp Burch p...@hb9etc.ch
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] mach3
Hi Gene,
I think that Alex meant to send back the broken Google, not Mach3 ;)
Cheers,
Philipp
On 05.07.2014 13:09
Lester,
What do you mean by hacked versions? The original Mach3 prior to the
latest secure activation scheme was not copy protected. You could buy
a copy and get the license key and duplicate it a thousand times if you
wanted to. The only recourse that Mach3 had was to prevent it from
Aram,
Mach3 works when used within its limits.
But if you want to do any customization of Mach3 you need to know its
limits.
Get on the Forum and do some research and don't think you can just work
around the well known issues.
http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php?board=1.0
Dave
On
I have no horse in his race but found this thread amusing until now.
On 07/05/2014 05:23 AM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Not sure what Aram is looking for but why is there so many catty remarks
and so much sarcasm. I can think of more than one reason to explore a
different system.
When you are
Rafael,
I also don't find this thread amusing.
I don't consider anyone a target. Sorry, no catty remarks from me.
Thanks
Stuart
On Jul 5, 2014 11:32 AM, Rafael Skodlar ra...@linwin.com wrote:
I have no horse in his race but found this thread amusing until now.
On 07/05/2014 05:23 AM, Stuart
On 05/07/14 17:25, Dave Cole wrote:
That would not surprise me. There are people out there who have become
very good at removing activations.
There are site 'selling' Mach3 below the cost of a licence. Some of the
licences are simply copies, others are 'hacked' keys. Yes you only need
a
On 7/5/2014 12:30 PM, Rafael Skodlar wrote:
When you are exploring a different system then ask questions about it on
related forums.
Except that he said that he could not find the appropriate forum and he
was asking for direction. That seems reasonable to me.
You need to go read email
There are site 'selling' Mach3 below the cost of a licence.
That's a new low. :-(
Dave
On 7/5/2014 3:53 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
On 05/07/14 17:25, Dave Cole wrote:
That would not surprise me. There are people out there who have become
very good at removing activations.
There are site
Hi
I can see that some people get obsession for FREE thing like a free help.
If it is FREE , one free to do everything. Why?--- because it is FREE.
No rule no restriction because it is FREE.
One remark – you got what you paid for---
Possible talk a lot about FREE thing ( google.com is
On Saturday 05 July 2014 20:05:56 a k did opine
And Gene did reply:
Hi
I can see that some people get obsession for FREE thing like a free
help.
If it is FREE , one free to do everything. Why?--- because it is FREE.
No rule no restriction because it is FREE.
One remark – you
Your Google is broken
On 2014-07-03 21:54, a k wrote:
hi
i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
thanks
aram
--
Open source business
hi
i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
thanks
aram
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes
On 03/07/14 20:54, a k wrote:
hi
i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
There is only one manufacturer who is Newfangled
http://www.machsupport.com/
There are a growing number of hacked versions floating around :(
Hi Aram!
On 03.07.2014 21:54, a k wrote:
hi
i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
You would also ask Apple about who develops MS Word, wouldn't you?
Anyway, a quick web search yielded this promising link:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:20:38 -0400, you wrote:
Is there a fundamental difference between the Mach3 and the EMC G/M
Codes or will all regular/CAM generated stuff for Mach3 run also with
Turn differs, EMC uses G33 for threading, rather than the much more
common G32, Toolchange parameters differ, as
rather than the much more common G32,
I wonder how you determined that?
I see some controls using G33 (Okuma, Fanuc, etc) and others G32 (Haas,
Heidenhein?, etc).
Regards,
Alex
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Thanks! I see that I have to study that in detail. A company is
providing me with a software module and I have to submit G/M codes for
that. I try to keep it in the set describing mach3 and emc
capabilities as I am going to switch from Mach3 in the near future.
Cheers and thanks
Rainer
On Fri,
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:36:19 +0300, you wrote:
rather than the much more common G32,
I wonder how you determined that?
I see some controls using G33 (Okuma, Fanuc, etc) and others G32 (Haas,
Heidenhein?, etc).
Early Fanucs did use G33 - they changed to G32 after 11 series IIRC.
Steve
Is there a fundamental difference between the Mach3 and the EMC G/M
Codes or will all regular/CAM generated stuff for Mach3 run also with
EMC?
Cheers
Rainer
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements
Rainer Schmidt wrote:
Is there a fundamental difference between the Mach3 and the EMC G/M
Codes or will all regular/CAM generated stuff for Mach3 run also with
EMC?
I don't know all the differences, but I do know that there are some
canned cycles in Mach that EMC2 doesn't have, like G10/G11
38 matches
Mail list logo
