Fellow non -objects .,
There's some great information being posted on here [ re: -000 ] however
could folks please kindly refrain from "top -posting" or more commonly known
as "hitting reply without editing" and "adding one piddly non -sequitur" to
the
top of everybody else's thoughts?
It pains
Aesthetics, ideology? I was thinking of Lotfi Zadeh's work when I mentioned
that - not fur balls.
best
Simon
On 27 Jun 2012, at 18:04, Timothy Morton wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> OOO objects are far more fuzzy than your metaphysically present fuzz. They
> are ontologically fuzzy.
>
> To say
It's been a long time since I was flamed on a list. Didn't think that happened
anymore and that we had learned how to behave in such public spaces. I don't
think patronising condescension is appropriate.
Why do you think I'm a conceptual artist? (I'm not).
best
Simon
On 27 Jun 2012, at 17:11
Dear All,
Ok - so if the academic banter is to continue - lets make it somewhat jovial.
@Edurado
No-ones really being disrespectful or denying the importance of conceptual art.
The flurry of activity both in conceptual art and it's twin contemporary;
systems art was directly aimed at formalis
Yes Grosz.Wonderful piece by her on why she no longer is a materialist
Very beautiful on matter and life. Patricia
From: empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
[empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au] On Behalf Of pinar yoldas
[p...@duke.edu]
S
Hi Patricia,
Is that piece from Becoming Undone? I'm writing an essay on ecocriticism and
materialism and would dearly love to read it, as I am not a materialist either
at this point, and it may be that there are some convergences.
Yours, Tim
http://www.ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com
On
Like most art-institutions, this list is
highly-restrictive/censored.
/:b
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Ian Bogost wrote:
> I apologize in advance for posting this.
>
> But is there a reason this email list withholds messages for many hours and
> then distributes them all in a burst? Is every message
On 06/28/2012 05:56 AM, Timothy Morton wrote:
Lots of artists and musicians are now tuning into OOO.
Yes Ian's book contains some interesting examples.
The problem is that the defenses of OOO against charges of failing to
illustrate Marxism indicate that OOO aesthetics is probably a category
