Alright, all changes applied and pushed. You can see the history (for
the time being, that is) on
https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/commits/master
The main PDF file has been regenerated. When this is all OK'd, I guess
it'll have to be regenerated again with print colors & crop m
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Nuritzi Sanchez
>
> Anyway, all of that is to say that I think we should build time into the
> annual report process to allow us to make a few tweaks after the layout is
> done.
>
Yeah that was where I wanted to come with my previous remark. Its great to
see someo
I think we should add a step to the process where we can make minor tweaks
to the report's content after seeing the layout, like proofreading changes
and such.
At work, we usually leave a few rounds for making sure the content looks
good in the design. Part of the reason is that it's one thing to
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam
wrote:
> So if y'all are fine with the fixes proposed in my previous mail, I'll
> do them.
>
Please do.
--
-mvh Oliver Propst
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gn
Le vendredi 25 septembre 2015 à 10:42 +0200, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
> Uh, hold on. Are these wording fixes that are coming now, when the
> design in in place. Wasn't the process that was set up supposed to
> deal with this on an earlier stage?
> For me, it's OK, since you'll do the adjustments y
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Allan Day wrote:
>
> I was thoroughly distracted by the release notes when a lot of this
> was happening,
Also had a busy period when some of this happened.
> but perhaps we should have had a more definite
> announcement of the period for final corrections?
>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
> Alright, here is my big list of nitpicks. If there are no objections I
> could fix them tomorrow or this week-end.
>
Think its great if you to want/are able to "fix" these things during the
weekend. That said the fixes must or less be don
On 09/25/2015 05:19 AM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
Le mardi 22 septembre 2015 à 19:13 +0100, Allan Day a écrit :
It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?
Out of curiosity, I looked into how the current Scribus file f
On 09/22/2015 08:13 PM, Allan Day wrote:
Thanks for working on this, Andreas! It looks great.
I'm pretty busy with the release, so I've only had a quick look. Two
thoughts though:
1. It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
year's, possibly by changing the colours used on
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Uh, hold on. Are these wording fixes that are coming now, when the design in
> in place. Wasn't the process that was set up supposed to deal with this on
> an earlier stage?
>
> For me, it's OK, since you'll do the adjustments yourself. I just want to
> stress that the pro
Uh, hold on. Are these wording fixes that are coming now, when the
design in in place. Wasn't the process that was set up supposed to deal
with this on an earlier stage?
For me, it's OK, since you'll do the adjustments yourself. I just want
to stress that the process exist for a reason.
- Andre
Alright, here is my big list of nitpicks. If there are no objections I
could fix them tomorrow or this week-end.
Also, I'd like to retroactively correct the previous year report's date
to reduce confusion.
Page 1
- Correct my name for photo attribution
- Add/correct credits for coordinators, proo
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Karen Sandler wrote:
> On 2015-09-24 05:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>> On 09/22/2015 07:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
>> Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)
>>
>> PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
>> If you have any issues,
Le mardi 22 septembre 2015 à 19:13 +0100, Allan Day a écrit :
> It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
> year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?
Out of curiosity, I looked into how the current Scribus file for the
report is done, and it looks like this
On 2015-09-24 05:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On 09/22/2015 07:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)
PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.
Actually, I purposely did no
On 2015-09-24 10:20, Allan Day wrote:
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
...
(It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)
I assume that we're aiming to get the annual report out to advisory
board members in the period when they are planning their budgets for
the next financial ye
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
...
>> (It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)
>
> I assume that we're aiming to get the annual report out to advisory
> board members in the period when they are planning their budgets for
> the next financial year. Do we have an idea of when
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015, 6:01 AM Allan Day wrote:
Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
...
> I was under the impression that the report should correspond to the
> financial years as it is partially targeted at the adboard, so
> 2013-2014 would make more sense to me.
Ah yes, that's true. My mistake!
> (It
Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
...
> I was under the impression that the report should correspond to the
> financial years as it is partially targeted at the adboard, so
> 2013-2014 would make more sense to me.
Ah yes, that's true. My mistake!
> (It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 repo
On 09/22/2015 07:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)
PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.
Actually, I purposely did not include my signature as I believe this t
On 23 September 2015 at 21:10, Oliver Propst wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Nuritzi Sanchez
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so sounds like we should change the title to "GNOME Annual Report
>> 2014-15". -
>
>
> Yeah actually sounds logical and as a good idea to me. Definitely support
> this suggest
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Nuritzi Sanchez <
nurit...@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> Ok, so sounds like we should change the title to "*GNOME Annual Report
> 2014-15*". -
>
Yeah actually sounds logical and as a good idea to me. Definitely support
this suggestion.
--
-mvh Oliver Propst
_
Ok, so sounds like we should change the title to "*GNOME Annual Report
2014-15*".
*@Andreas*, can you please help us do that? Let us know if you have time to
change the cover artwork. Otherwise, we may want to move on and just make a
note to change the theme next year.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:
El Martes 22 de septiembre de 2015 20:13, Allan Day
escribió:
>Thanks for working on this, Andreas! It looks great.
>
Yes, I agree. I'm very impressed for the visual aspect of the annual report.
>
>I'm pretty busy with the release, so I've only had a quick look. Two
>thoughts though:
>
>
>
Thanks for working on this, Andreas! It looks great.
I'm pretty busy with the release, so I've only had a quick look. Two
thoughts though:
1. It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?
2. As I mentioned previously, I
Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)
> PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
> If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.
Actually, I purposely did not include my signature as I believe this to
be a security risk: we have had occurrences
On 09/21/2015 09:53 PM, Bastian Ilso wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Looks awesome! I see a "$PAGE" in the letter from gnome foundation
letter? :)
Fixed.
- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
On 09/22/2015 01:12 AM, Alexandre Franke wrote:
I guess that means it's too late for content changes, but just in case
it's not, I'd add the locations for the events in "Other conferences"
on page 13:
"staffed a booth at Fosdem (Brussels, Belgium), JDLL (Lyon, France),
and FSCONS (Gothenburg, Swe
Thanks so much for doing the layout Andreas, looks great.
Think we should aim to have a publish ready version of the report early
next week (which includes minor fixes).
Have started working on a announcement post (available in our WordPress
instance as a draft) which I plan to finish during the
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Hi!
Hej,
> Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
> Please double check everything is correct with regards to page numbers,
> paragraphs, margins, credits etc.
I guess that means it's too late for content changes,
Another quick one:
on page 18 it says 'Accessability' in the header instead of
'Accessibility'.
-Bastian
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:53 , Bastian Ilso
wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Looks awesome! I see a "$PAGE" in the letter from gnome foundation
letter? :)
-Bastian
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:1
Hi Andreas,
Looks awesome! I see a "$PAGE" in the letter from gnome foundation
letter? :)
-Bastian
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:11 , Andreas Nilsson
wrote:
Hi!
Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
Please double check everything is correct with regards to page
numbe
Hi!
Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
Please double check everything is correct with regards to page numbers,
paragraphs, margins, credits etc.
Source scribus file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/master/annual-report-2015/GAR201
33 matches
Mail list logo
