> Yes, 8192 is non standard but what you link to is not correct for real
> world front end applications
The FAQ entry is correct.
> but 4096 is not too big to be default, if
> it is why do lots modern interface default to larger than 2048?
Because there are a lot of people who demand
On 5/13/2016 12:43 PM, Phil Kane wrote:
> On 5/13/2016 4:53 AM, David wrote:
>
>> The developer of the extension "Send Later" has said that it is too much
>> work for him to keep his extension compatible with Enigmail.
>
> This is becoming all too frequent with Thunderbird add-ons,
On 5/13/2016 4:53 AM, David wrote:
> The developer of the extension "Send Later" has said that it is too much
> work for him to keep his extension compatible with Enigmail.
This is becoming all too frequent with Thunderbird add-ons, unfortunately.
> Also there is an extension named "Send Later
On 5/13/2016 3:25 AM, Elias Assmann wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Recently, Enigmail notified me that it is no longer compatible with Send
> Later and deactivated the latter. In the first place, why is it
> impossible or impractical to combine the two?
>
> I find both Enigmail and Send Later useful,
On 2016-05-12 19:31, Hauke Westemeier wrote:
My master key is 8192 RSA
to my knowledge GnuPG only supports up to 4096-bit keys.
See here
https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#default_rsa2048
for my source and some explanation why already a 4096 bit key is to
large to be made the default.
Enigmail does not check for compatibility with _any_ other add-on, nor can it
deactivate other add-ons. The message you saw most likely comes from upgrading
Thunderbird.
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Elias Assmann
Sent: 13.05.2016 - 09:25
To:
Hi List,
Recently, Enigmail notified me that it is no longer compatible with Send
Later and deactivated the latter. In the first place, why is it
impossible or impractical to combine the two?
I find both Enigmail and Send Later useful, and would like to continue
to use both of them. If this