On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:20:05 -0800 (GMT) Xun Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> > On the other hand, if a package like gtk or freetype
> > fulfills the
> > need, you
> > get several benefits:
> >
> > 1) You save programmer time not re-creating the library.
> > 2) You get to share the shared li
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:30:46 -0500 Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> * Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030313 18:57]:
> >
> > things are coming together. these are building blocks that will make
> > building e
>
> So, when will e17 be released ?? :)
when its ready. :)
--
---
* Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030313 18:57]:
>
> things are coming together. these are building blocks that will make
> building e
So, when will e17 be released ?? :)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
> On the other hand, if a package like gtk or freetype
> fulfills the
> need, you
> get several benefits:
>
> 1) You save programmer time not re-creating the library.
> 2) You get to share the shared library instead of dragging
> along
> your own
> subtly different library.
If the external dep
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:38:46 -0800 (PST) "Ben Rockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
>
> > However, I'm not sure myself either, and I'd really like to know what
> > exactly is going to happen with all the other libs too.. Lately, it
> > seems to be more or less impossible to contribute code to
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:52:21 +0100 GnuMdk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting for it.
> Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always use
> gtk+-1.2 instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E17 is
> always(a lot o
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:48:46 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:41:51 PST, Xun Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I actually hope E17 could get rid of dependencies
> > on gtk, freetype etc.
>
> On the other hand, if a package like gtk or freetype fulfills the need, you
>
At 07:52 PM 3/13/2003 +0100, GnuMdk wrote:
I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting for it.
Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always use gtk+-1.2
instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E17 is always(a lot on my
computer) unstable and I think i
E doesn't use GTK. GTK was used for the interfaces of Ebony and Etcher,
but because EWL wasn't ready to be used at the time and the interfaces
were quick to put together. In the end I doubt any apps would use GTK in
the end, as we'd prefer to use EWL.
benr.
> I was an E16 fan but since E17 is
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:41:51 PST, Xun Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I actually hope E17 could get rid of dependencies
> on gtk, freetype etc.
On the other hand, if a package like gtk or freetype fulfills the need, you
get several benefits:
1) You save programmer time not re-creating the libr
> However, I'm not sure myself either, and I'd really like to know what
> exactly is going to happen with all the other libs too.. Lately, it
> seems to be more or less impossible to contribute code to the core
> components because nobody really knows what we're heading for anymore..
I'm not sur
I actually hope E17 could get rid of dependencies
on gtk, freetype etc.
xun
> I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting
> for it.
> Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always use
> gtk+-1.2 instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E17 is
> always(
On Thursday, 13 March 2003, at 19:31:38 (+0200),
Robert Gabriel wrote:
> Can one change the block cursor to an underscore (_)?
Nope.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
--
I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting for it.
Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always use
gtk+-1.2 instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E17 is
always(a lot on my computer) unstable and I think it will be a bad
thing to release E17 with
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:28:41 GMT, Richard Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Could this whole discussion be made irrelevant if people could
> "full-screen" (borderless) an application and push it to the bottom
> layer? Then anyone could effectivly make *any* application their
> background. I a
Can one change the block cursor to an underscore (_)?
I've changed the cursor & text cursor colours but am curious.
I've looked at the man page & one can only have a cursor or no cursor.
Robert
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Ch
At 01:56 PM 3/13/2003 +0100, Stefan Held wrote:
Am Don, 2003-03-13 um 11.28 schrieb Richard Martin:
> Personally I would never have a flash backdrop (actually my desktops
> are so cluttered I never even see my backdrops), but I can imagine
> people wanting it.
>
So do i, but do you agree that peopl
Am Don, 2003-03-13 um 11.28 schrieb Richard Martin:
> Strange... I thought E was about user choice and flexibility, not
> making assumptions about what people will or will not want.
>
Youre Right. It is.
> Personally I would never have a flash backdrop (actually my desktops
> are so cluttered I
Strange... I thought E was about user choice and flexibility, not making
assumptions about what people will or will not want.
Personally I would never have a flash backdrop (actually my desktops are
so cluttered I never even see my backdrops), but I can imagine people wanting
it.
Question:
Co
Most of you guys know I'm a novice coder at best, so bear with me here.
Looking over the api's for Estyle and Etox, I'm trying to figure out where
these guys fit in, long term. From my lame point of view I don't see much
that Etox and Estyle can provide that EVAS can't. I suppose that Estyle
cou
20 matches
Mail list logo
