Re: [E-devel] edje compile error

2003-08-28 Thread Alan Schmitt
* Aaron Michael Cohen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I got this when compiling edje. > > > make > make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/acohen/dump/e17.org/e17/libs/edje' > Making all in src > make[2]: Entering directory > `/home/acohen/dump/e17.org/e17/libs/edje/src' > Making al

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-28 Thread BAM
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:02, Kim Woelders wrote: > > On a unrelated note: does anybody remember the move/resize demo > > patch? It was commented out before 0.16.5. How hard would it be to > > get it in shape for 0.16.6? > > > What is that thing? src/ChangeLog: Mon Apr 24 15:57:55 PDT 2000 (Kain

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-28 Thread Kim Woelders
BAM wrote: Umm... yeah... I think you're misunderstanding me! Yes, I think I was. I have been thinking focuslist options while you have been talking iconbox options. Maybe it would make sense to add an option to iconboxes. How about "show applications in focus list" (implied: if this iconbox is vi

[E-devel] edje compile error

2003-08-28 Thread Aaron Michael Cohen
I got this when compiling edje. make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/acohen/dump/e17.org/e17/libs/edje' Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/home/acohen/dump/e17.org/e17/libs/edje/src' Making all in lib make[3]: Entering directory `/home/acohen/dump/e17.org/e17/l

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-28 Thread BAM
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 19:48, BAM wrote: > Anyway, it's just a demonstration of what I'm talking about, not ready > to be committed at all. I forgot: if you try this patch you have to edit ~/.enlightenment/...e_session-XX before you can go back to the "real" e16. Just remove the "354" (the new