Re: [E-devel] E SVN: titan trunk/PROTO/emote/src/lib/protocols/irc

2010-08-23 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > Wrong use of EMAPI... dang search and replace. the make them static ? Vincent > > Author: titan > Date: 2010-08-23 19:47:21 -0700 (Mon, 23 Aug 2010) > New Revision: 51594 > > Modified: > trunk/PROTO/emote/src/lib/protocols

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-08-23 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:05:57 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN" > said: > >> Log: >> * ecore: struct a b = { 0 }; doesn't mean memset. >> >> Author: cedric >> Date: 2010-08-23 06:05:57 -0700 (Mon, 23 Aug 2010) >> New Revis

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 24 August 2010, at 14:38:17 (+1000), David Seikel wrote: > Um, so it's just a cast to boolean really? Though still it's not the > same thing as checking for equality with NULL. In the case of pointers, > it's the equivalence or lack of equivalence with NULL that is the > important th

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:59:54 -0700 Michael Jennings wrote: > On Tuesday, 24 August 2010, at 13:32:06 (+1000), > David Seikel wrote: > > > I'm going to agree that !! is unreadable. Um, does that mean > > negate the negation, hence do nothing, or is their an obscure !! > > operator I have somehow

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 24 August 2010, at 13:32:06 (+1000), David Seikel wrote: > I'm going to agree that !! is unreadable. Um, does that mean > negate the negation, hence do nothing, or is their an obscure !! > operator I have somehow missed in my decades of C programming? > > Don't think I have ever seen

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:46:39 +0200 Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:28 -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote : > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN > > wrote: > > > Log: > > >  Revert coccinelle changes. > > > > > >  Using !! instead of != NULL results in significantly and

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:03:02 -0300 Marina Proni wrote: > Here's an attempt at a "powered by EFL" logo and a signature for > small use. My first impression is that it's not "efl", but "eh". Powered by Canadians? The signature one looks more like "fl" following a circular graphic, so you can't w

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-08-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:05:57 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN" said: > Log: > * ecore: struct a b = { 0 }; doesn't mean memset. > > Author: cedric > Date: 2010-08-23 06:05:57 -0700 (Mon, 23 Aug 2010) > New Revision: 51571 > > Modified: > trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_main.c

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Brian Wang
Nice! On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Marina Proni wrote: > Hello everyone > > Here's an attempt at a "powered by EFL" logo and a signature for small use. > > Both the images and svg sources for them are attached. > > Please fell free to replay with suggestions. > > > > > PS. Antognolli and Lui

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:04:02 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Massimo Maiurana wrote: > > Stephen Houston, il 23/08/2010 17:35, scrisse: > >> I like it! > > > > me too :) > > Definitly so much better ! I vote for it too ! what? don't we need some more primary colors a

[E-devel] [PATCH] Evas directfb include.

2010-08-23 Thread Eduardo Felipe
Hi folks, this is a tiny patch that fixes evas include of header directfb.h. The current include makes it hard for people with multiple versions of DirectFB installed to compile the code. This is the correct way to include that header, and it's the way ecore_directfb does it. Cheers, Eduardo. d

[E-devel] [PATCH] Edje program name.

2010-08-23 Thread Eduardo Felipe
Hi folks, in the good old days, before the edje file format rewrite, one was able to create programs without name. If one needed to use that program in an action or after clausule, one needed to declare the name. But for programs that only reacts to signals so the name is not relevant. Sachiel sa

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 23 August 2010, at 15:36:36 (-0300), Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Ahn... you are talking about the other changes. I can disable those > and apply for you if you want. But it's well > automated/understandable by SCRIPTS/coccinelle/spatchall.sh, if you > want to apply by yourself. I am very

Re: [E-devel] mapping function key in eterm.

2010-08-23 Thread Michael Jennings
On Saturday, 21 August 2010, at 17:47:23 (+0530), rahul wrote: > how can i pass the mapping key to the command line argument of > eterm.I have invoke eterm from xterm. For example: $ Eterm -a 'actions bind F2 to menu Eterm' The syntax is the same as in the config file. "man Eterm" for details

[E-devel] mapping function key in eterm.

2010-08-23 Thread rahul
Hello, how can i pass the mapping key to the command line argument of eterm.I have invoke eterm from xterm. Thanking you. -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of thi

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:28 -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote : > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > >  Revert coccinelle changes. > > > >  Using !! instead of != NULL results in significantly and unacceptably > >  less readable code, and I refuse to accept those chang

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: >> Log: >>  Revert coccinelle changes. >> >>  Using !! instead of != NULL results in significantly and unacceptably >>  less readable code, and I refuse to accept those changes. >

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: mej IN trunk/eterm: Eterm/src Eterm/utils libast/src libast/test spite

2010-08-23 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: >  Revert coccinelle changes. > >  Using !! instead of != NULL results in significantly and unacceptably >  less readable code, and I refuse to accept those changes. >  Unfortunately, since they were all done at once, I have to rever

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Marina Proni
That's why I created a "signature" version which can be placed over a button or just in the bottom of a site (something discreet). And why I created a shape for the "EFL"? well ... for those who already saw the image / logo (thinking in the smallest size of use). So they don't need to read it agai

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Luchezar Petkov
First - are the EFL a separate brand than the Enlightenment project? If this is the case, then it needs a new logo. If not - I don't think so, otherwise, it may cause confusion. Second - the "powered by" stuff are just labels/buttons, basically a simple and a small piece of computer graphics to th

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Luis Felipe Strano Moraes
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tom Haste wrote: > On 24 August 2010 00:33, Marina Proni wrote: >> hum... >> i couldn't find any font here... >> maybe there is something hidden, but not being used. > > > Ah yep I see its already a path... just a basic Sans serif? I would > have imagined somethin

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Marina Proni
yes, it is a basic Sans serif, including the "FL". I made some changes (like rounded corners) on these characters to match properly with the "e". On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tom Haste wrote: > On 24 August 2010 00:33, Marina Proni wrote: > > hum... > > i couldn't find any font here...

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Haste
On 24 August 2010 00:33, Marina Proni wrote: > hum... > i couldn't find any font here... > maybe there is something hidden, but not being used. Ah yep I see its already a path... just a basic Sans serif? I would have imagined something more in tune with the 'f' and 'l' in the logo. As for a Par

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Marina Proni
hum... i couldn't find any font here... maybe there is something hidden, but not being used. On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Tom Haste wrote: > The signature file... Im guessing there was another font in that? If > youre using Inkscape, you select the font and click Path > Object to > Path in

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Luis Felipe Strano Moraes
Tom, any chance we can get a version based on that paradiso theme you did? --lf On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Tom Haste wrote: > The signature file... Im guessing there was another font in that? If > youre using Inkscape, you select the font and click Path > Object to > Path in the menu. O

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Haste
The signature file... Im guessing there was another font in that? If youre using Inkscape, you select the font and click Path > Object to Path in the menu. Otherwise, NEAT! On 24 August 2010 00:14, Massimiliano wrote: > +1, very nice! > > Massimiliano > > 2010/8/23 Marina Proni : >> Hello everyo

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Massimiliano
+1, very nice! Massimiliano 2010/8/23 Marina Proni : > Hello everyone > > Here's an attempt at a "powered by EFL" logo and a signature for small use. > > Both the images and svg sources for them are attached. > > Please fell free to replay with suggestions. > > > > > PS. Antognolli and Luis Felip

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Massimo Maiurana wrote: > Stephen Houston, il 23/08/2010 17:35, scrisse: >> I like it! > > me too :) Definitly so much better ! I vote for it too ! -- Cedric BAIL -- This SF.net email is

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Massimo Maiurana
Stephen Houston, il 23/08/2010 17:35, scrisse: > I like it! > me too :) -- Massimo Maiurana massimoragusa.linux.it http://massimo.solira.orgGPG keyID #7044D601 Creare l'uomo fu un'idea bizzarra e originale, ma aggiungere la pecora fu una tautologia.

Re: [E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Stephen Houston
I like it! On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Marina Proni wrote: > Hello everyone > > Here's an attempt at a "powered by EFL" logo and a signature for small use. > > Both the images and svg sources for them are attached. > > Please fell free to replay with suggestions. > > > > > PS. Antognolli and

[E-devel] Exchange content converted to new edje format.

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Haste
Greetings! Ive just run edje_convert over all the exchange content. This has put all the content into the new edje format. It is backwards compatible, so anyone thats not using the alpha builds can still use the files, but it also means the people on the bleeding edge can continue to have a sassy

[E-devel] "Powered by EFL" Logo ?

2010-08-23 Thread Marina Proni
Hello everyone Here's an attempt at a "powered by EFL" logo and a signature for small use. Both the images and svg sources for them are attached. Please fell free to replay with suggestions. PS. Antognolli and Luis Felipe inspired me with their logo =P -- Marina pulsoideias.com.br <><>---

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster trunk/eina/src/include

2010-08-23 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 06:08:38AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > > -#if defined (__MacOSX__) || defined (__FreeBSD__) || (defined (__MACH__) > > && \ > > - defined (__APPLE__)) > > -# include > > -#endif > > +#include > > Did Joerg try that on all the platforms that were in the #define ? If n

Re: [E-devel] Exchange content

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Haste
On 23 August 2010 15:39, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Tom Haste wrote: >> Exchange content is now basically outdated due to the edje changes. >> Also, gradient has been knocked out, so that changes a lot of things. >> Im going to run edje_convert on all the site contents,

Re: [E-devel] Exchange content

2010-08-23 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Tom Haste wrote: > Exchange content is now basically outdated due to the edje changes. > Also, gradient has been knocked out, so that changes a lot of things. > Im going to run edje_convert on all the site contents, to bring all > that up to the recent API. Im gues

[E-devel] Exchange content

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Haste
Hi all, Exchange content is now basically outdated due to the edje changes. Also, gradient has been knocked out, so that changes a lot of things. Im going to run edje_convert on all the site contents, to bring all that up to the recent API. Im guessing this will cause a wave of problems with peopl