On 05/13/2011 10:46 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 17:41:29 +0200
Mathieu Taillefumiermathieu.taillefum...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
actually i
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 17:41:29 +0200
Mathieu Taillefumier mathieu.taillefum...@free.fr
Hi, ran into trouble building from svn. Had a succesful build on a
different system a few days ago. Compilation fails on the ecore-con
module, looked like a simple unbalanced #if/#endif job so had a look
at src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_ssl.c and added #ifdef USE_GNUTLS on
line 32 and carried
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Jethro Donaldson
jethro.donald...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, ran into trouble building from svn. Had a succesful build on a
different system a few days ago. Compilation fails on the ecore-con
module, looked like a simple unbalanced #if/#endif job so had a look
at
On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:04:34 +0200 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri,
On Sat, 14 May 2011, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote:
On 05/13/2011 10:46 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 17:41:29 +0200
Mathieu
But 1.0.1 should be in place, basic testing (I did none) should be
enough as they should be only bug fixes.
Grr, don't change the subject, I don't care about a 1.0, I want a 1.1 :)
Though while we are at it: yeah, we should probably release 1.0.1 as well.
Once 1,0.1 or 1.1 is released it
Once 1,0.1 or 1.1 is released it would be cool to know also what version
of things like python-efl, editje and elementary is compatible with it.
Yeah, this might be needed :)
+1
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org wrote:
But 1.0.1 should
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org wrote:
But 1.0.1 should be in place, basic testing (I did none) should be
enough as they should be only bug fixes.
Grr, don't change the subject, I don't care about a 1.0, I want a 1.1 :)
Though while we are at it: yeah, we
This is wrong. I am away now and can't explain the details
On May 14, 2011 2:58 PM, Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org
wrote:
Log:
Elm/Theme/Application/Content-Back: elm.swallow.end rel2 needs to be
vertical 0.0 so it lines up with the back button and the title.. (I am
pretty sure
On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:55:25 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:04:34 +0200 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com
wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Attached patch renames the mouse bindings (conf_bindings), registered as
Mouse to Mouse Buttons, because there is also Mouse in
conf_interaction.
Patch is on e17 root, not svnroot.
Alternative would be to merge both modules.
Index: src/modules/conf_keybindings/e_mod_main.c
Hmm okay. Well like I said.. I tried to stick a button there and it ended up
being really really weird.. Very skinny and stretched the whole length of
the window. I know what I committed fixed that. So there must be some other
case in use that needs it to be 0.0 - 1.0 instead of 0.0 - 0.0
On
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.comwrote:
The only reason for this is that I'll probably be working pretty closely
with BSD in my job in the near future.
Why?
--
Tom.
--
Achieve
some questions:
* is it normal that in eina_condition_free(), the mutex is not destroyed ?
* in eina_lock_take()
#ifdef EINA_HAVE_ON_OFF_THREADS
if (!_eina_threads_activated)
{
#ifdef EINA_HAVE_DEBUG_THREADS
assert(pthread_equal(_eina_main_loop, pthread_self()));
#endif
This is not a design issue but just implementation detail. It can be added
later without problems
Also we should have preload to minimize the performance problem.
On May 14, 2011 9:09 PM, Wido wido...@gmail.com wrote:
General Users = safety, if any of these loaders crash or hung, the main
On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:09:25 -0300 Wido wido...@gmail.com said:
General Users = safety, if any of these loaders crash or hung, the main
program/process will not crash.
actually... hanging can be a problem as evas opens a pipe and waits on
blocking
input. it has no timeout, so if it
On Sat, 14 May 2011 19:36:04 +0200 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr
wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org
wrote:
But 1.0.1 should be in place, basic testing (I did none) should be
enough as they should be only bug fixes.
Grr, don't change the subject, I
is the patch below good ?
Vincent
Index: src/lib/cache/evas_cache_image.c
===
--- src/lib/cache/evas_cache_image.c(revision 59392)
+++ src/lib/cache/evas_cache_image.c(working copy)
@@ -557,12 +557,14 @@
{
19 matches
Mail list logo
