Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

I understand now. My initial understanding of "themes are now stable" was that existing themes that worked previously would always work until it was stated we things where going to break. Not a big deal. Will just stick with the release I have that works until time permits for me to compare every

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

On 11/19/2015 05:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:11:43 +1030 Simon Lees said: > >> >> On 11/19/2015 10:38 AM, Jeff Hoogland wrote: >>> I understand why this broke and I appreciate folks pointing out the fix. >>> The point is it still broke and will require

Re: [E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License

Thanks for all your advices. Hope it won't be too painful to reach my goals... Regards Envoy? via Outlook Mobile De : Carsten Haitzler Envoy? : jeudi 19 novembre 07:01 Objet : Re: [E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License ? : Olivier Nougarede On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:32:1

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:11:43 +1030 Simon Lees said: > > > On 11/19/2015 10:38 AM, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > > I understand why this broke and I appreciate folks pointing out the fix. > > The point is it still broke and will require more time to fix the new elm > > we are using / maintaining. > > >

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

On 11/19/2015 10:38 AM, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > I understand why this broke and I appreciate folks pointing out the fix. > The point is it still broke and will require more time to fix the new elm > we are using / maintaining. > > My point is that any change like this feels bad and makes updating

[E-devel] Fwd: Re: Stripping EFL libs and License

Envoy? via Outlook Mobile De : Olivier Nougarede Envoy? : jeudi 19 novembre 06:32 Objet : Re: [E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License ? : ras...@rasterman.com So i will recompile them to get rid of unneeded symbols. In that process, do i have to keep the original na

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

Normally I would not comment on a thread like this as "the issue" seems to be resolved However, I just wanted to add a note for Jeff (and potentially others who do distros, themes, etc) and that is: If You make themes, new code, code changes, etc, which basically "copies the default" (the

Re: [E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License

On 11/18/2015 06:00 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hello, > > Le 19 nov. 2015 04:29, "Olivier Nougarede" a écrit : >> Just wanted to know if it possible to strip efl shared libs in order to > only use the symbols my app needs. >> >> If so by which means: >> >>- can i strip the "normal" efl libs (the

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

I understand why this broke and I appreciate folks pointing out the fix. The point is it still broke and will require more time to fix the new elm we are using / maintaining. My point is that any change like this feels bad and makes updating difficult. Not a big deal, I will make a note when I eve

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:20:14 -0600 Jeff Hoogland said: > Good to know the theme API still is allowed to break release to release. > > Guess I'll stick with 1.15 for awhile so I don't have to worry about > chasing down issues with each release. no one said it was allowed to break and no single c

Re: [E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:29:25 + Olivier Nougarede said: > Hi, > > > Just wanted to know if it possible to strip efl shared libs in order to only > use the symbols my app needs. > > > If so by which means: > > - can i strip the "normal" efl libs (the one produced as explained in your > d

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

Thanks Mike for the complete break down and analysis of where the problem did come from. That's one problem less to worry about. Le 15 nov. 2015 11:21, "Jeff Hoogland" a écrit : > > Opened a ticket -> https://phab.enlightenment.org/T2848 > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Simon Lees wrote: > >

Re: [E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License

Hello, Le 19 nov. 2015 04:29, "Olivier Nougarede" a écrit : > Just wanted to know if it possible to strip efl shared libs in order to only use the symbols my app needs. > > If so by which means: > > - can i strip the "normal" efl libs (the one produced as explained in your download page) > >

Re: [E-devel] E20 Final

On 11/18/2015 03:47 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > Looking at the current list of reported bugs, there are no open tickets > which can be considered as release blockers, nor have there been any such > issues reported or handled over the past few weeks. > > If no one opens a ticket with a release bl

[E-devel] E20 Final

Looking at the current list of reported bugs, there are no open tickets which can be considered as release blockers, nor have there been any such issues reported or handled over the past few weeks. If no one opens a ticket with a release blocking issue, I am expecting to execute this release eithe

[E-devel] Stripping EFL libs and License

Hi, Just wanted to know if it possible to strip efl shared libs in order to only use the symbols my app needs. If so by which means: - can i strip the "normal" efl libs (the one produced as explained in your download page) - or do i have to recompile the libs in order to adjust them to

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment Foundation Libraries 1.16 and Friends are Out

Good to know the theme API still is allowed to break release to release. Guess I'll stick with 1.15 for awhile so I don't have to worry about chasing down issues with each release. On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > Opened a ticket -> https://phab.enlightenment.org/T2848 >

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/01: Revert "eet: removing useless assignment variables."

I fixed it in master. Seriously though, the original patch has been submitted by an external contributor and *reviewed*. This is a three line patch that is obviously wrong. Please take care when reviewing! -- Tom. On 18/11/15 09:43, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > stefan pushed a commit to branch mas