[E-devel] Status of eflete and enventor

Checking on the status of eflete and enventor, presently cannot build either against 1.20.7. I did not try against EFL from git/live. eflete got updated for EFL 1.19 which is required for eflete 1.19.1, but 1.20 broke that and no movement on task I opened a bit ago. Even live from git does not

[E-devel] Tag and release equate and emprint

I have been using both these for some time. They still build and work fine with EFL 1.20.7. Could someone create a tag and do a release of them? It would add a little to the available apps. Thanks! -- William L. Thomson Jr. pgpDpRUEh0vse.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[E-devel] Second may meeting

Hello, the second may meeting took place today. The irc log, meeting minutes and attendees are captured in the following wiki page: https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/meetings/2018/may_2/ The next meeting date will be announced next week Greetings, bu5hm4n

Re: [E-devel] IRC notifications for TravisCI builds enabled on probation

On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:49:59 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > I think there is no need to ever build /dev/ branches since these can > (and sometimes should) be knowingly pushed even when they don't > build. Only feature/, stable, and master branches should ever be

Re: [E-devel] IRC notifications for TravisCI builds enabled on probation

I think there is no need to ever build /dev/ branches since these can (and sometimes should) be knowingly pushed even when they don't build. Only feature/, stable, and master branches should ever be involved with CI. Is there a way to limit this? On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:54 AM Stefan Schmidt

Re: [E-devel] Heads up on upcoming 1.21 stabilization phase

I think we should make it a policy going forward that the stabilization period cannot begin until all pending patch submissions have been reviewed. There are still a ton of patches out there which haven't been looked at, and "I didn't feel like reviewing patches" should never be a reason why

Re: [E-devel] Edi 0.6.1 release

On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:21:50 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > > Do you have a URL or something for bear? I cannot find any information > on that, my search fu is weak. Not sure if an ebuild for Gentoo > exists. Not seeing anything within Gentoo's portage at the

Re: [E-devel] Edi 0.6.1 release

On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:30:23 +0100 Andrew Williams wrote: > Hi, > > There are no new dependencies as far as I’m aware - bear has been > used for a while to generate compile_commands.json in c builds. I must have never checked for options and/or missed them. That is the

Re: [E-devel] Edi 0.6.1 release

Hi, There are no new dependencies as far as I’m aware - bear has been used for a while to generate compile_commands.json in c builds. Andrew On Thu, 17 May 2018 at 15:43, William L. Thomson Jr. < wlt...@obsidian-studios.com> wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 09:24:55 +0100 > Andrew Williams

Re: [E-devel] Edi 0.6.1 release

On Thu, 17 May 2018 09:24:55 +0100 Andrew Williams wrote: > Hi, > > Since Edi is no longer hosted on e.org it seemed inappropriate to > push it to old download locations. It has been posted on GitHub for > years so it's not the immediate transition that it seemed to you.

Re: [E-devel] Heads up on upcoming 1.21 stabilization phase

Beautiful. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > Another update on this. > > On 08.05.2018 21:41, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > > On 04/27/2018 01:38 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > > There sadly has not been as much progress as hoped for.

[E-devel] IRC notifications for TravisCI builds enabled on probation

Hello. During today's IRC meeting the question came up why we do not have TravisCI build getting reported to the channel. When I initially wanted to do this I stopped when I saw that it will report results from all branches, not only master. There seem to be no way to configure the branches it

Re: [E-devel] Heads up on upcoming 1.21 stabilization phase

Hello. Another update on this. On 08.05.2018 21:41, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > On 04/27/2018 01:38 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > There sadly has not been as much progress as hoped for. > I still wait for the following items: > > o Cedric's last branch to be merged (lifecycle?). What is the

Re: [E-devel] Edi 0.6.1 release

Hi, Since Edi is no longer hosted on e.org it seemed inappropriate to push it to old download locations. It has been posted on GitHub for years so it's not the immediate transition that it seemed to you. The .gz -> .xz was an artifact of moving to Meson which was done in parallel with E -