Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:16:19 +0100 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
@@ -569,7 +581,7 @@
if test x$have_ecore_fb = xyes ; then
AC_CHECK_HEADER(tslib.h,
[
- tslib_libs=-lts
+ AC_CHECK_LIB(ts, ts_open,
mario wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 11:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still working on my arm board:
All it's ok evas_fb_test run perfectly.
Now I'm working on edje: there is a problem in a simple program:
Mario, it works great on Nokia devices (arm1136jf-s and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave wrote:
Hi all,
Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status.
I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje
(bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready
to be committed to the edje cvs, but I didn't get any devs
Dave, this is great news!
I have filed a patch to bgzilla with this first implementation. bug#294
Uh oh... Raster, please consider looking at the bugzilla this time ;)
If you want to try it simply patch edje and set
#define TEST_DIRECT_EDJE 1
in edje_editor/src/bin/main.h on line 15
then
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
But is it really reasonable to split ecore in such small parts? In
particular when you think on ecore_txt (1 function) or ecore_job (1 + 3
functions).
Another point in splitting should be to make ecore_evas check engines
runtime and not
If you want to be nice to cross-compilation environments,
AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) edje_cc
is more advisable than
edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc since in
the latter case it would probably point to the cross-compiled edje_cc
which we surely can't run during
src/engines/ecore_evas_software_x11/Makefile
src/engines/ecore_evas_software_x11_16/Makefile
src/engines/ecore_evas_gl_x11/Makefile
+src/engines/ecore_evas_software_sdl/Makefile
src/engines/ecore_fb/Makefile
Could you briefly summarize why we have to have different etk engines?
I can
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On 8/22/07, Enlightenment CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : andreas
Project : e17
Module : proto/eflpp
Dir : e17/proto/eflpp/examples/ecore/callbacks
Modified Files:
main.cpp
Log Message:
- added GL and
muzzle wrote:
Is there some embedded distribution interested in using efl to build
their graphic environment (I think angstrom was considering ea e17
environment)?
I'm one of the founders of Angstrom and we have added E17 as one of
the UI options in our images.
I remember seeing something on
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:55:09 +0200 Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
I found this patch to be necessary when working with Ecore X windows that
register with the window manager as the desktop window -- otherwise I
can't get the correct size
Kim Woelders wrote:
Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:55:09 +0200 Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
I found this patch to be necessary when working with Ecore X windows that
register with the window manager as the desktop
I found this patch to be necessary when working with Ecore X windows that
register with the window manager as the desktop window -- otherwise I
can't get the correct size of the desktop minus the space that's
occupied by panels etc.
(The only glitch is that the semantics is not symmetrical to
http://linuxtogo.org/~mickeyl/patches/ecore-add-get-workarea.patch
Regards,
:M:
--
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges.
(I hope you don't mind an outsiders view on the project...)
I have been following this project since 2002 and while I'm not so
much interested in a window manager (I'm into mobile embedded
systems), I have become more and more excited about your base libraries
(including Etk and Ewl).
Luckily
Vincent Torri wrote:
no. It has been added intentionnaly. As I said in my commit message, it's
to avoid a circular dependancy.
I see, ok, thanks.
Please describe the error. It compiles, install and work fine on my
computer. Maybe I've forgotten to commit something.
Make: No rule to build
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
style = EVAS_TEXT_STYLE_OUTLINE_SHADOW;
else if (ep-part-effect == EDJE_TEXT_EFFECT_OUTLINE_SOFT_SHADOW)
style = EVAS_TEXT_STYLE_OUTLINE_SOFT_SHADOW;
+ else if (ep-part-effect ==
Hi,
I have been working on C++ bindings to EFL for quite a while now, and
since recently Andreas 'audifahrer' Volz contact me to support working
on that, I'd like to introduce them to the Enlightenment CVS to make
them more visible.
Judging from the state, I think they would make a perfect fit
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
missing 1 thing - we need your ssh public key (id_dsa.pub)
oops ;)
(attached)
Cheers,
:M:
--
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de-
This SF.net email is sponsored by
18 matches
Mail list logo
