On Monday 05 August 2013 18:23, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote :
> Hello,
Hello,
>
> Is there any reason in eo2 why the eo wrapper function (the ones
> defined by EO2_FUNC_BODY et al) doesn't call the function directly,
> instead of registering it with Eo2_Op_Description. Which adds an
> unnecessa
Hello,
Is there any reason in eo2 why the eo wrapper function (the ones
defined by EO2_FUNC_BODY et al) doesn't call the function directly,
instead of registering it with Eo2_Op_Description. Which adds an
unnecessary indirection.
Also, I've been experimenting with changing Eo to make the class
in
On 02/08/13 02:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>
> Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
> can use them :
> - espion, that does trace every call to elementary and ef
On 05/08/13 06:48, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> On 08/05/2013 02:12 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Sunday 04 August 2013 10:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>> Hello Daniel
>>> On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42
On 04/08/13 08:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>>> Impr
On Monday 05 August 2013 12:18, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> >> > these where my numbers beforeand
Hi Jeremy
On 08/05/2013 02:12 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Sunday 04 August 2013 10:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
>> Hi Jeremy,
> Hello Daniel
>> On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 20
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > these where my numbers beforeand now
>> >
>> > simple inc() - 9 calls
>> > calls/eo_do() EO
Hi Jeremy,
On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>> Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools tha
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > what is the purpose of these hooks again,
>
> Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
> can use them :
> - espion, that does trace every call to
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
can use them :
- espion, that does trace every call to elementary and efl to rebuild
a fake application without the applica
Hi Cédric,
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
these where my numbers beforeand now
simple inc() - 9 calls
calls/eo_do() EO [ns]/call - EO2 [ns]/call - EO2 [ns]/call
#1 20 2529
#3 11 15
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> >>
On Monday 29 July 2013 16:03, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 29/07/13 16:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
> >> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Fri, 26 Jul
On 29/07/13 16:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> O
On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> >> said:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Hai
On 29/07/13 14:49, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> the con I could see is we loose validation in the caller, you'd need
>> to validate in the function... Example:
>> eo_do(evas_obj, ecore_timer_interval_set(1
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
[snip]
> the con I could see is we loose validation in the caller, you'd need
> to validate in the function... Example:
> eo_do(evas_obj, ecore_timer_interval_set(10.0));
> this would still call directly ecore_timer_interval_s
On 27/07/13 03:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> said:
>>>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>>> said:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitz
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>
>> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> > said:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carst
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> said:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustav
On Saturday 27 July 2013 21:02, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> >> said:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> > said:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -03
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> said:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustav
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > said:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 20
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Ha
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy
On 26/07/13 15:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
>>>
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a
On 26/07/13 15:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
>>>
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverz
On 23/07/13 16:05, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> do {
> __VA_ARGS__ // (like we do now)
> } while (0);
> if (0)
> bla(__VA_ARGS__) // this will do the checking for us.
>
Actually, this wouldn't work. :( The problem is, some of the functions
in __VA_ARGS__ may return void, which will break things
On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> said:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom H
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky said:
> Hi,
>
> Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> > > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurc
On 25/07/13 18:58, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>>>
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less ma
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy
Occurs to me Go language calls this "deferred", in it we could defer a call to
be called at every exit point.
Maybe there is an defer extension to compilers providing deferred calls in c?
--Gustavo
Sent from my iPhone
On 25/07/2013, at 20:54, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> >>
> >>> just to clarify a few points:
> >>>
> >>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>>
>>> just to clarify a few points:
>>>
>>> - I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
>>>act
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>
>> just to clarify a few points:
>>
>> - I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
>>actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called e
On 23/07/13 17:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
>>> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>>>
>>> eo2_do(obj,
>>>a = ins
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> just to clarify a few points:
>
> - I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
> actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
> is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or a call_ctx
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or a call_ctx (devs/jeyzu/eo2)
this should go away if we use a stack per thread
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> > ok. looked at eo2test.c
> >
> > eo2_do(obj,
> > a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
> > inst_func(eo_o
On 23/07/13 02:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>>> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>>>
>>> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> said:
>>
>> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>>
>> eo2_do(obj,
>> a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
>> inst_func(eo_o, 10);
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>
> eo2_do(obj,
> a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
> inst_func(eo_o, 10);
> b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
> );
>
> first... p
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
> >
> > On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> >> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> >> sai
On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>
> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> said:
>>
>> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>>
>> eo2_do(obj,
>>
On 18/07/13 03:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> said:
>>> On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:24:03 +0900 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> >> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>
> Enjoy !
>
> >> On Friday 12 July 2013
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
>> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
Enjoy !
>> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
>> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +010
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
> Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
>
> On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> > ok. looked at eo2test.c
> >
> >
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
> ok. looked at eo2test.c
>
>eo2_do(obj,
> a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
> inst_func(eo_o, 10
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>> On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> > On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> >> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Sc
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> >> wrote:
>
> Before the efl
On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
Before the efl merge and the git move Daniel and myself played around
with what we
Hello.
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Before the efl merge and the git move Daniel and myself played around
>>> with what we already had in svn and made it work again. Should be
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>> wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:07:14 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:58:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> said:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> > > On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
> >>>
Eo is one of the biggest change we
Hello.
On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>> On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>>
>>> Eo is one of the biggest change we did for 1.8. At this stage it is
>>> optimized to a po
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:58:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL said:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
...
> >> That lead to an equivalent question, how many people have yet reviewed
> >>
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
>>> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
>> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
>> We revisited some old ideas, tried some ne
On 10/07/13 11:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 09/07/13 03:55, Cars
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
inst_func(eo_o, 10);
b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
);
first... passing in eo_o... should probably go away. ie
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_fun
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2013 19:11, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>
On Thursday 11 July 2013 19:11, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> >> > still not fully functional,
> >> >
> >> > here is the concept:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > still not fully functional,
>> >
>> > here is the concept:
>> >
>> > - enhance const Eo_Op_Description *descs; in Eo_Clas
On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > still not fully functional,
> >
> > here is the concept:
> >
> > - enhance const Eo_Op_Description *descs; in Eo_Class_Description into:
> >
> > typedef struct _Eo_Op_Description
sorry the thread is broken, I forgot to synk the mailbox when leaving
the office, btw here are my numbers from afdb8f3
gcc (GCC) 4.8.1
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @2.93GHz
64 bits
with -g -ggdb3 -O3
Signal/Basic Tests: OK
Signal/CollectorVector: OK
Signal/CollectorUntil0: OK
Signal/Collect
Hi,
could you have a look at devs/jeyzu/eo2
the last commit propose something to solve the func as OP issue,
it just needs Eo_Op_Description to be replaced with a new struct,
so for now it just calls op 0 all the time.
--- Hell'O from Yverdoom
Jérémy (jeyzu)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> >> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >>
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> >> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> >> > said
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>> > said:
>> >
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has b
On 09/07/13 15:08, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around an
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> >> improve Eo and ad
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
>> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
>> We revisited
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 12:09, Cedric BAIL wrote :
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> > improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> > We revisited some old id
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> Hey guys,
>
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
> comprom
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
> compromises and pref
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> Hey guys,
>
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
> We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
> comprom
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> forgot to git-daemon-export-ok?
> http://git.enlightenment.org/devs/tasn/eo2.git = no repositories found
>
You can find it on the core efl repository in devs/tasn/eo2 branch.
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
forgot to git-daemon-export-ok?
http://git.enlightenment.org/devs/tasn/eo2.git = no repositories found
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
> improve Eo and address all the issues that have bee
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
compromises and preferences to better suit our needs (followed by the
ext
87 matches
Mail list logo