On Fri 14 Feb 2003, Ben Martin wrote:
*snip*
> Maybe we can add a list of which projects should get the new love, so
> that folks dont start hacking on something like ebits1 etc? This way
> they know what is for hacking and that those projects need love no
> matter how many names are attached.
Gim
>> technically cvs does this for us :)
>
> Well, that was partially my point. But now that I think about it:
>
> - No, cvs only tracks who changes what. We need to encourage commit
> comments that say what the change does functionally.
> - I'd suggest not using the ChangeLog files on pre 1.0
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 06:37:12 EST, Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> - I'd suggest not using the ChangeLog files on pre 1.0 apps/libs and
> sticking to it. For packages that are stable, then a ChangeLog should
This implies that we force something to go to 1.0 when there's enough usage
"Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)" wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:19:26 -0500 Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > Ben Rockwood wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > (snip)
> > >been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of
> >
> > Well, one of the points of doing ne
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:19:26 -0500 Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
> >
> >
> (snip)
> >been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of
>
> Well, one of the points of doing new/early development in cvs is that
> you don't maintain a chang
On 14 Feb 2003 12:10:40 +1000 Ben Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:35, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. collect all names from AUTHORS files. list all of them. (this will assume
> > the step of making sure they are up-to-date has been done) i REPEAT it is
> > th
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:35, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> 1. collect all names from AUTHORS files. list all of them. (this will assume the
> step of making sure they are up-to-date has been done) i REPEAT it is the
> responsibility of the contributors to make sure their patches include patches to
Agreed In which case you might wanna just put a reference to SF's CVS
Web, which can act as a ChangeLog. Since most projects aren't GPL I
don't think we're stuck with all the Changelog requirements.
benr.
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
>>
>>
> (snip)
>>been noted in the AUTHORS files of each pro
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:19:09 -0800 (PST) "Ben Rockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
> Hello All.
>
> I'm planning a complete re-vamp of the team page soon to remove all the
> old non-active people from that page. The hope is to encourage new
> people to join the effort who may look at
Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>
(snip)
>been noted in the AUTHORS files of each project and the ChangeLog of
Well, one of the points of doing new/early development in cvs is that
you don't maintain a changelog...
--
Kevin
---
This SF.NET email
Hello All.
I'm planning a complete re-vamp of the team page soon to remove all the
old non-active people from that page. The hope is to encourage new
people to join the effort who may look at that page now and think we
have plenty of people, and to make sure that credit goes to those who
11 matches
Mail list logo
