On Tue, 20 May 2008 10:14:48 -0300 "Diego Bitencourt Contezini"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
hmm. i'd rather hold here in favor of a much more... expansive set of vgfx
support... and nail this kind of thing all in one shot.
> We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of
>
Diego wrote:
> We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of
> evas-lines in python (our case). Yes, we could just use polygons, but we are
> trying to reduce processor usage at this point.
> Its faster to draw lines (with lines implementation) directly, specially
> deali
This patches I sent last mail are the last working, sorry, I forgot to tell.
They are with two corrections we've got here in testing.
Diego
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visu
We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of
evas-lines in python (our case). Yes, we could just use polygons, but we are
trying to reduce processor usage at this point.
Its faster to draw lines (with lines implementation) directly, specially
dealing with vertical/horizontal
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:20:27 -0300 "Diego Bitencourt Contezini"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
any reason you didnt just use polygons? :)
> Hello all.
> Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more
> then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N8
Diego wrote:
> Hello all.
> Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more
> then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N800),
> because object Line dont have width support, so its needen to use Rectangles
> to make it works.
>
> I made a modi
Hi Diego,
Forget about the API break, my mistake.
As soon as I have time will take a look more deeply and test some benchmarks.
BR,
Adriano
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Adriano Rezende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Diego Bitencourt Contezini
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all.
>> Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more
>> then one pixel of width,
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Diego Bitencourt Contezini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all.
> Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more
> then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N800),
> because object Line dont have width suppo
Hello all.
Working with evas+Lines in python, is fast. But if you need a line with more
then one pixel of width, it gets very slow (in dispositives like N800),
because object Line dont have width support, so its needen to use Rectangles
to make it works.
I made a modification to support width in L
10 matches
Mail list logo
