Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2011-03-18 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:13:19 +0100 Yassin frechdes...@gmail.com said: Hello, what about this manual,please? nothng much has happened. basically it's hard to do a good manual as long as all the documentation is in the .c files of libs - ie we have to trawl all sources to get doxygen info out

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2011-02-22 Thread Yassin
Hello, what about this manual,please? On 17/12/2010 18:11, Kim Lester wrote: All, A few notes and two requests (marked *** ) 1) Attached is a 0th order draft of a proposed EFL manual to replace all the other manuals. Or more accurately here is a half written manual to replace the

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2011-01-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:44:06 +0100 Lionel Orry lionel.o...@gmail.com said: On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:59:54 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr said: that leads to #1. as such developers do hate having

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-28 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:19:23 +0100 Lionel Orry lionel.o...@gmail.com said: Hmmm... ok - time to chime in. 1. i'm kind of worried how any such efl manual and doxygen docs will work together. as such doxy is pretty much the

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-28 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:59:54 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr said: that leads to #1. as such developers do hate having to fire up OO to document things. but as such the things they document are in text anyway - in the source in javadoc. what i want to know is.. how will these

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:19:23 +0100 Lionel Orry lionel.o...@gmail.com said: Hmmm... ok - time to chime in. 1. i'm kind of worried how any such efl manual and doxygen docs will work together. as such doxy is pretty much the best/only way to document an API (we dont use it for documenting the code

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-20 Thread Thomas Gstädtner
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 22:13, Lionel Orry lionel.o...@gmail.com wrote: Kim Lester kim at dfusion.com.au writes: All, A few notes and two requests (marked *** ) [...] Incidentally I wrote this in OO simply because writing either doxygen or xml is not a good way to evolve a large complex

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-20 Thread Lionel Orry
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Thomas Gstädtner tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote: On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 22:13, Lionel Orry lionel.o...@gmail.com wrote: Kim Lester kim at dfusion.com.au writes: All, A few notes and two requests (marked *** ) [...] Incidentally I wrote this in OO simply

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-17 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:11:28 +1100 Kim Lester k...@dfusion.com.au wrote: All, A few notes and two requests (marked *** ) 1) Attached is a 0th order draft of a proposed EFL manual to replace all the other manuals. Or more accurately here is a half written manual to replace the other half

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-17 Thread Lionel Orry
Kim Lester kim at dfusion.com.au writes: All, A few notes and two requests (marked *** ) [...] Incidentally I wrote this in OO simply because writing either doxygen or xml is not a good way to evolve a large complex document. I've written large docs in TeX with vi before and whilst

Re: [E-devel] Proposed new EFL Manual (and some wiki updates)

2010-12-17 Thread Issa
héhé that's cool 2010/12/17 Lionel Orry lionel.o...@gmail.com Kim Lester kim at dfusion.com.au writes: All, A few notes and two requests (marked *** ) [...] Incidentally I wrote this in OO simply because writing either doxygen or xml is not a good way to evolve a large