Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-10 Thread Jose Souza
Updated: - using a elm_table instead of a simple edje - yodafy close_all - removed backlog stuff of Terminology - using a single eet file to save Terminology terms dirs. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wr

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:09:43 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jose Souza >> wrote: >> > I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the >> > implementation of they in terminol

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:01:53 -0300 Jose Souza > said: > >> I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the >> implementation of they in terminology. >> >> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehort

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:01:53 -0300 Jose Souza said: > I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the > implementation of they in terminology. > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl test code - why use edje for layout? it just b

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:09:43 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jose Souza wrote: > > I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the > > implementation of they in terminology. > > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-06 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jose Souza wrote: > I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the > implementation of they in terminology. > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl > > http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/terminology.

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-06 Thread Iván Briano
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jose Souza wrote: >> I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the >> implementation of they in terminology. >> >> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehor

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-09-06 Thread Jose Souza
I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the implementation of they in terminology. http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/terminology.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl On Mon, Aug 26, 2

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-26 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > Hello, > > Cedric Bail > On Aug 15, 2013 12:23 PM, "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" > wrote: > > > > One of the open items from "Enlightenment For Mobile" is how to manage > > single instance applications in a nice way. While I have thrown some >

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-26 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hello, Cedric Bail On Aug 15, 2013 12:23 PM, "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" wrote: > > One of the open items from "Enlightenment For Mobile" is how to manage > single instance applications in a nice way. While I have thrown some > ideas, Raster and others had some comments. > > I've tried to summariz

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-21 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 21/08/2013, at 00:03, Iván Briano wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> ping? >> >> zehortigoza is implementing this in a branch for elm, then will do the >> first usage in terminology exposing each tab/window as its own view. >> we should then have

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-20 Thread Iván Briano
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > ping? > > zehortigoza is implementing this in a branch for elm, then will do the > first usage in terminology exposing each tab/window as its own view. > we should then have something more concrete to look at and play... but > if

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
ping? zehortigoza is implementing this in a branch for elm, then will do the first usage in terminology exposing each tab/window as its own view. we should then have something more concrete to look at and play... but if you foresee problems say now and save him some time :-) On Thu, Aug 15, 2013

Re: [E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-15 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Hi all, Just incremented the proposal with an Elm API to implement. Zeh should tackle this soon, so please comment on it ASAP :-) On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > One of the open items from "Enlightenment For Mobile" is how to manage > single instance applicatio

[E-devel] RFC Enlightenment Application spec

2013-08-14 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
One of the open items from "Enlightenment For Mobile" is how to manage single instance applications in a nice way. While I have thrown some ideas, Raster and others had some comments. I've tried to summarize my idea at https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/enlightenmentappspecproposal/ Please comment