On 12/19/2010 06:52 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:29:36 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
>
>> Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
>>>
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Hai
On 12/19/2010 09:26 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> test the package. As already said, tests should not require external services
> like X to run and if
> some tests need such a service, they should be skipped or there should be an
> option to skip them.
You want to verify EFL, which is all about gr
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:01:30 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:14 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said:
> >
> > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> > > > tests are for developpers, not packagers
> > >
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:02:54 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
> more answers
>
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> >> tests are for developpers, not packagers
> >
> > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuite
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:29:36 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
> > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> >
> >> Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
> >>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Tho
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:02 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> >I understand users not listening or unwilling to fix the suite to fit their
> >needs is a pain, but let's not make it an even greater pain for people who
> >just
> >want to use it and manage to. Things have improved a lot as far as packagin
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:49 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> >>tests are for developpers, not packagers
> >
> >That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple
> >reaso
more answers
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
>> tests are for developpers, not packagers
>
> That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
> as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, t
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
>> tests are for developpers, not packagers
>
> That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
> as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, that will neve
Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
>
>> Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
>>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
>>>
>> packagers should test the package, before
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:14 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said:
>
> > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> > > tests are for developpers, not packagers
> >
> > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> >
> >> Attached is a build log with the failures.
> >
> > ok. since your position is that tests should work even
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> > tests are for developpers, not packagers
>
> That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
> as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code,
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
>
>> Attached is a build log with the failures.
>
> ok. since your position is that tests should work even if u enable them and
> they cant connect to a display, or that we nee
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> tests are for developpers, not packagers
That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason:
as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, that will never guarantee
proper behaviour on the system on which th
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Kim Lester wrote:
> All,
>
> I've not been around here long enough to know/care _where_ tests are located.
> Nor have I studied the tests in question (so I probably don't know what I'm
> talking about :-) )
>
> However I have been a developer long enough to know that ideall
All,
I've not been around here long enough to know/care _where_ tests are located.
Nor have I studied the tests in question (so I probably don't know what I'm
talking about :-) )
However I have been a developer long enough to know that ideally all tests
should be self contained.
Tests should ne
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> Attached is a build log with the failures.
ok. since your position is that tests should work even if u enable them and
they cant connect to a display, or that we need to go fine-graining tests just
so you can --enable things that you would
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> Attached is a build log with the failures.
gentoo ebuild problem - not ecore. pay closer attention to what failed and have
a think about it :)
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Car
hey
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Attached is a build log with the failures.
thanks for the log, but:
1) configure gcc to display english messages
2) please strip the log so that it contains the usefull messages
3) if it's about DSO (i looked at the log and it is too huge to real
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote :
> Attached is a build log with the failures.
Are you by any chance building on a headless machine, or in a tty ? If so, that
failure is expected - the test fails whenever ecore can't reach the X server. I
ended up disabling this test completel
21 matches
Mail list logo
