On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:11:43 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
(de)compression library:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than
zlib.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:54:41 +0200 Thomas Gstädtner
tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:15, Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr
wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
while
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Thomas Gstädtner wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:15, Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that
Hey,
while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
(de)compression library:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than zlib.
There is no comparison numbers, but maybe it is worth trying to compare
zlib and that lib
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
(de)compression library:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than
zlib.
There
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, David Seikel wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless
(de)compression library:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
which says to compress better and to be
