On Mon, 23 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> ecore: backport r58033.
it takes more time to read the changelog and see which commit has to be
backported than backported immediatly
Raster, can you please backport immediatly your commits (if necessary) ?
Vincent
>
>
> Author: c
On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
that requires i read the changelog and commit those patches - and it takes
time. as you said.
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > ecore: backport r58033.
>
> it takes more time to read the changelog and se
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
> that requires i read the changelog and commit those patches - and it takes
> time. as you said.
A lot less than what cedric is doing right now
Vincent
>
>> On Mo
On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> > that requires i read the changelog and commit those patches - and it takes
> > time.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
>> > said:
>> >
>> > that requires i read the c
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
>> said:
>>
>> that requires i read the changelog and commit those patches - and it takes
>> time. as you said.
>
> A lot les
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
>>>
>>> said:
>>>
>>> that requires i read the changelog and comm
On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> >> said:
> >>
> >> that requires i read t
On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:10:03 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +0200 (C
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:04 +
On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon,
Hi,
I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I got 4
responses. This is not sufficient.
Take your removable hard drives and plug them in. Put a cd in your cdrom
drive. Run the test as root to let it open your devices. Reply to me with the
output.
Thanks.
--
Mike B
On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:32:59 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:10:03 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > > said:
> > >> On Mon, 23 May
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:32:59 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:10:03 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:54:2
2011/5/23 Enlightenment SVN
> Log:
> and flip now does shading nicely. rather hacky, but works well.
>
>
>
>
First version was working well with edje object, but this one is limited to
image only ?
BTW it's a cool feature ;)
--
Nicolas Aguirre
Mail: aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
Web: http://enna.gee
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:39:39 +0200 Nicolas Aguirre
said:
> 2011/5/23 Enlightenment SVN
>
> > Log:
> > and flip now does shading nicely. rather hacky, but works well.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> First version was working well with edje object, but this one is limited to
> image only ?
> BTW it's a cool fe
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:39:39 +0200 Nicolas Aguirre
> said:
>
>> 2011/5/23 Enlightenment SVN
>>
>>> Log:
>>> and flip now does shading nicely. rather hacky, but works well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> First version was working well with edje
Hi,
then you need a another theme for elm_list which fits the box size.
You could write down a separated theme from the default list theme.
Open elementary theme file.
"elementary/data/theme/default.edc"
Then find out list groups
"group { name: "elm/list/..." (there are a few maybe...)
as
On Mon, 23 May 2011 15:25:26 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:39:39 +0200 Nicolas Aguirre
> > said:
> >
> >> 2011/5/23 Enlightenment SVN
> >>
> >>> Log:
> >>> and flip now does shading nicely. rat
Hi devs,
We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
trunk, you can't use the application in svn to test it, but should
rather try the on
Hi,
> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
> trunk, you can't use the application in svn to test it, but should
> rather try t
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
> trunk, you can't use the appli
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:27:16 +0200
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:32:59 +0900
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:10:03 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> >> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
>> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
>> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
>> trunk, you can't use
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
>>> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
>>> tarball from http://www.enlightenment
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi devs,
We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
tarball fro
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I got
> 4
> responses. This is not sufficient.
Call me lazy! What command?
These are in my PATH:
eeze_disk_ls eeze_mounteeze_umount
Lucas D
$ sudo eeze_disk_ls
Found the following unmounted disks:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.7/usb1/1-1/1-1:1.0/host11/target11:0:0/11:0:0:0/block/sdb
- /dev/sdb:(null)
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/block/sda/sda1
- /dev/sda1:/
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I
>> got 4
>> responses. This is not sufficient.
>
> Call me lazy! What command?
>
> T
On Mon, 23 May 2011 18:31:07 -0300
Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I
> > got 4 responses. This is not sufficient.
>
> Call me lazy! What command?
>
On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:43 +0200
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I
> >> g
On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:39:05 +0300
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> $ sudo eeze_disk_ls
> Found the following unmounted disks:
>
> /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.7/usb1/1-1/1-1:1.0/host11/target11:0:0/11:0:0:0/block/sdb
> - /dev/sdb:(null)
>
> /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:43 +0200
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I
> >> g
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:43 +0200
> Steven Le Roux wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I requ
On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:06:29 +0200
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:43 +0200
> > Steven Le Roux wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 23,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:06:29 +0200
> Steven Le Roux wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:43 +0200
>> > Steven Le Roux wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:31
On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:18:35 +0200
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:06:29 +0200
> > Steven Le Roux wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:43 +0
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:18:35 +0200
>> Steven Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:06:29 +0200
>>>
This patch is good and important. Shouldn't that patch be backported to 1.0
branch also?
2011. 5. 21. 오후 2:24에 "Enlightenment SVN" 님이 작성:
>
> Log:
> Ecore ecore_main.c: Refactoring _ecore_main_loop_iterate_internal().
>
>
> Author: seoz
> Date: 2011-05-20 22:24:27 -0700 (Fri, 20 May 2
Yeah right.
I was working on that. And stopped by another issue :)
I'll do this very soon.
Thanks!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
2011/5/24 Jihoon Kim :
> This patch is good and important. Shouldn't that patch be backported to 1.0
> branch also?
> 2011. 5. 21. 오후 2:24에 "Enlightenment SVN" 님이 작성:
>>
>>
On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:34:49 +0200
Steven Le Roux wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:18:35 +0200
> >> Steven Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:15 AM,
On 05/23/11 07:41, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I requested that everyone re-run the eeze udev test a couple weeks ago. I got
> 4
> responses. This is not sufficient.
>
> Take your removable hard drives and plug them in. Put a cd in your cdrom
> drive. Run the test as root to let it open y
42 matches
Mail list logo