Re: [e-users] Elementary (Topic changed)

2009-04-10 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:59:39 +0200 schrieb Vincent Pomageot: Looks nice! I'll try it next week. For my embedded application I use a minimal self written widget toolkit on top of eflmm, but I really need to put more work into it... Maybe I'll start a eflmm wrapper for Elementary. Any ideas how sta

Re: [e-users] Fwd: abou animated / edj icons

2009-04-10 Thread Dave Andreoli
2009/4/8 PaulTT > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:20:25 +0200 PaulTT said: > > > >> is it possible to insert text into an icon? > >> or also make the icon itself change some parts based on a time change? > >> > >> (i'd like to make up a calend

Re: [e-users] Elementary (Topic changed)

2009-04-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:27:14 +0200 Andreas Volz said: > Am Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:59:39 +0200 schrieb Vincent Pomageot: > > Looks nice! I'll try it next week. For my embedded application I use > a minimal self written widget toolkit on top of eflmm, but I really > need to put more work into it... >

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread Toma
On the 3 month cycle, is this time frame based on amount of current work on E or just a random number? Might want to make sure the dates are realistic in relation to E devs commitments. Toma On 4/10/09, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >>

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:29:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: ok. looking here the problme is.. you have a schedule.. that has none of the following: a knowledge of how long tasks will take people available to do the tasks time guaranteed from all the people this schedule doesn't account for

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Luca De Marini >> wrote: >>> 2009/4/9 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri and please, let's try to get these things upstream into debian, ubunt

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:29:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > > ok. looking here the problme is.. you have a schedule.. that has none of the > following: > > a knowledge of how long tasks will take > people available to do the tas

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:29:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> said: >> >> ok. looking here the problme is.. you have a schedule.. that has none of the >> following:

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 11:41 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Albin Tonnerre > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Luca De Marini > >> wrote: > >>> 2009/4/9 Gustavo Sverzut Bar

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:46:08 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:29:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > > ok. looking here the problme is.. you have a schedule.. that has none of the > > follo

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Release schedule

2009-04-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:46:08 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:29:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> > said: >> > >> > ok. looking here