Re: [e-users] Is it possible that E 0.24 broke xkbmap?

2020-09-17 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:51:37 -0700 Marc MERLIN said: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:08:22AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > They don't. You are the first person ever to have such an issue with xkb > > that I have seen who does a custom xkb layout instead of just xmodmap. I > > know of no standar

Re: [e-users] Is it possible that E 0.24 broke xkbmap?

2020-09-17 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:02:11 -0400 Conrad Knight said: > I posted to this list on 18th July about E 0.24 breaking xmodmap > (possibly, i was looking for confirmation and a fix). Could whatever > changed to break xkb also be affecting xmodmap? > > The tl;dr version of that message is: > Compose k

Re: [e-users] Is it possible that E 0.24 broke xkbmap?

2020-09-17 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:08:22AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > They don't. You are the first person ever to have such an issue with xkb that > I have seen who does a custom xkb layout instead of just xmodmap. I know of no > standard user file like ~/.Xmodmap for example for this - that is how

Re: [e-users] Is it possible that E 0.24 broke xkbmap?

2020-09-17 Thread Conrad Knight
I posted to this list on 18th July about E 0.24 breaking xmodmap (possibly, i was looking for confirmation and a fix). Could whatever changed to break xkb also be affecting xmodmap? The tl;dr version of that message is: Compose key still works (separately set by X), but xmodmap -e "keycode 133 = M

Re: [e-users] Is it possible that E 0.24 broke xkbmap?

2020-09-17 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:52:54 -0700 Marc MERLIN said: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:36:30PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > #ifdef XKB_BASE > > XKB_BASE "/rules/xorg.lst", > > XKB_BASE "/rules/xfree86.lst", > > #endif > > #if defined __NetBSD__ > > "/usr/X11R7/lib/X11/xkb