All,
>
> There is no practical definition for a complete theme, because there
> are way too many things to theme, and... even if a theme is complete
> in themeing everything in the core E, it will probably leave out a
> whole bunch of 3rd party modules.
> Also, using "widgets" can work right now,
There is a way to see all the themes that apply to enlightenment.
If you go into the enlightenment app
http://exchange.enlightenment.org/application/show/4
and scroll down, it shows a list of themes that apply to it.
Of course, it shows any theme that applies, not "complete" themes, so
it catches b
2008/7/27 Sthithaprajna Garapaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is a way to see all the themes that apply to enlightenment.
> If you go into the enlightenment app
> http://exchange.enlightenment.org/application/show/4
> and scroll down, it shows a list of themes that apply to it.
> Of course, it show
Interestingly enough, this just came up:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080723-myspace-joins-the-openid-bandwagon-as-a-provider.html
For those of us less familiar with OpenID it's an interesting read.
Not sure if it's "for" or "against" though :)
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Sthi
On 22-Jul-08, at 3:58 PM, Dan Kronstal wrote:
> I don't know if I'm missing the point here, but it sounds like
> OpenID is
> redundant. What we've got here is three subdomains with three
> logins/accounts when they could all be using one instead. bugtracker/
> trac
> are their own sites with t
The biggest problem with OpenID is that its not very good for desktop
apps. (it requires a browser and too many steps to allow apps to
authenticate)
So, any apps that would use the exchange API would suffer..
There is a public authentication system from google that's similar to
openID but friendli
Dave Andreoli wrote:
>> How trustworthy is openid? I see they are linked to AOL and Yahoo,
>> who
>> might not be as well-known for data collection as Google, but I would
>> be
>> greatly surprised if those services don't collect user data. I also
>> wouldn't believe what I hear. Much the same goes
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Dan Kronstal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems like a really nice addition to the site, and a little more
> cohesive than a separate site for themes and such, but as a general comment
> on the e.org site it seems that it might be better to have a unified accou
- "dan sinclair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On 22-Jul-08, at 3:58 PM, Dan Kronstal wrote:
>
> > I don't know if I'm missing the point here, but it sounds like
> > OpenID is
> > redundant. What we've got here is three subdomains with three
> > logins/accounts when they could all be u
I don't know if I'm missing the point here, but it sounds like OpenID is
redundant. What we've got here is three subdomains with three
logins/accounts when they could all be using one instead. bugtracker/trac
are their own sites with their own thing going on and that's fine, unless
you want fancy i
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:06:16 +0200 (CEST), "Dave Andreoli"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> - "Ethan Grammatikidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:12:02 +0200 (CEST), "Dave Andreoli"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > - "Sthithaprajna Garapaty" <[EMAIL
- "Ethan Grammatikidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:12:02 +0200 (CEST), "Dave Andreoli"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > - "Sthithaprajna Garapaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Dan Kronstal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:12:02 +0200 (CEST), "Dave Andreoli"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> - "Sthithaprajna Garapaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Dan Kronstal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > This seems like a really nice addition to the site, and
- "Sthithaprajna Garapaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Dan Kronstal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > This seems like a really nice addition to the site, and a little
> more
> > cohesive than a separate site for themes and such, but as a general
> comment
This seems like a really nice addition to the site, and a little more
cohesive than a separate site for themes and such, but as a general comment
on the e.org site it seems that it might be better to have a unified account
system. i have separate accounts for wiki.e.org, forum.e.org, and now
exchan
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:49:40 -0400, "Christopher Michael"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Maybe I am missing the point here, but aren't these themes already
> available via get-e.org ? Also, the mpdule, taskbar, and efm nav module
> are already available via cvsso what's the point of having Yet
Hello everyone,
to make this clear, GET-E.org will be closed. Exchange is a good
improvement and i like the idea to have everything under the e.org
domain. Also i see no sense in having two sites, providing the same.
The site will be up for a while until all the themes are moved to the
new domain.
For themes, you get a lot more information, that could be useful
depending on what you are looking for..
for example, if you dont like the look of your shelf and want to try
something else, you could go here:
http://exchange.enlightenment.org/themeGroup/show/2664
and find all the themes that provid
Maybe I am missing the point here, but aren't these themes already
available via get-e.org ? Also, the mpdule, taskbar, and efm nav module
are already available via cvsso what's the point of having Yet
Another Site ?
dh
Toma wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen!
>
> We are proud to announce the
19 matches
Mail list logo
