Hi!
Although this is not a direct E17 problem i'm sure many of you are using
Debian. I just set up my box with Debian/unstable and wanted (of course)
e17 on it. I found the e17 repository on edevelop.org and was really
happy about it. but now when i do an apt-get i get the error msg "E:
Packag
Manuel Werlberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Although this is not a direct E17 problem i'm sure many of you are using
> Debian. I just set up my box with Debian/unstable and wanted (of course)
> e17 on it. I found the e17 repository on edevelop.org and was really
> happy about it. but now when i do an apt
Dustin Jenkins wrote:
> I had it working with the http://edevelop.org/debian/ repository last
> night on my AMD64 box. I noticed that there was a mix of E16 and E17
> packages after I added the repository to my sources.list, so whether
> that had something to do with it I don't know. Is this an
Manuel Werlberger wrote:
> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>
>> I had it working with the http://edevelop.org/debian/ repository last
>> night on my AMD64 box. I noticed that there was a mix of E16 and E17
>> packages after I added the repository to my sources.list, so whether
>> that had something to
Dustin Jenkins wrote:
> Sorry for the stupid question, but did you run apt-get update before you
> did anything? Also, I didn't add those entries to my
> /etc/apt/preferences file, but I don't think that should make a
> difference for you. If you had the old enlightenment package installed
> (0
Manuel Werlberger wrote:
> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the stupid question, but did you run apt-get update before you
>> did anything? Also, I didn't add those entries to my
>> /etc/apt/preferences file, but I don't think that should make a
>> difference for you. If you had the old e
Manuel Werlberger wrote:
> Manuel Werlberger wrote:
>
>> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sorry for the stupid question, but did you run apt-get update before you
>>> did anything? Also, I didn't add those entries to my
>>> /etc/apt/preferences file, but I don't think that should make a
Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>Cool, excellent. Strange is right, I thought those entries in
>/etc/apt/preferences were pretty specific and made sense, but perhaps
>they were interfering. Anyway, well done.
>
>
>
As expected the entries in /etc/apt/preferences are needed. No
installation worked perfe
Manuel Werlberger wrote:
> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>
>
>> Cool, excellent. Strange is right, I thought those entries in
>> /etc/apt/preferences were pretty specific and made sense, but perhaps
>> they were interfering. Anyway, well done.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> As expected the entries in /etc/apt/p
Dustin Jenkins wrote:
> Manuel Werlberger wrote:
>
>> Dustin Jenkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cool, excellent. Strange is right, I thought those entries in
>>> /etc/apt/preferences were pretty specific and made sense, but perhaps
>>> they were interfering. Anyway, well done.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
