On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 03:58:14PM +0100, Vidar wrote:
> Matías Graña skreiv:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
> >> On 3/17/08, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
> >>> gnome-settings-da
Matías Graña skreiv:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
>
>> On 3/17/08, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
>>> gnome-settings-daemon, which I did to have gtk use the fonts I wanted
On 17/03/2008, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
> > On 3/17/08, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
> > > gnome-settings-daemon, which I did
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
> On 3/17/08, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
> > gnome-settings-daemon, which I did to have gtk use the fonts I wanted.
> > Apparently, a good ~/.gtkrc
On 17/03/2008, Nicolas Aguirre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/17/08, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
> > gnome-settings-daemon, which I did to have gtk use the fonts I wanted.
> > Apparently, a good ~/.gtkrc-2.0
On 3/17/08, Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
> gnome-settings-daemon, which I did to have gtk use the fonts I wanted.
> Apparently, a good ~/.gtkrc-2.0 does the same thing and does not
> interfere with E, solving the issue
Thanks to all who answered this! The problem comes from launching
gnome-settings-daemon, which I did to have gtk use the fonts I wanted.
Apparently, a good ~/.gtkrc-2.0 does the same thing and does not
interfere with E, solving the issue.
Anyway, this collision between E and Gnome could be worth o
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 16:14 +0100, Andreas Volz wrote:
> Am Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:34:36 -0200 schrieb Matías Graña:
>
> > hi!
> > I'm using e17 in two Gentoo boxes. In one of them, when I press
> > Alt+Tab to switch active window, the widget stays there even after I
> > release Alt and Tab. I make
according to this thread
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=704926 it can be fixed with
adding
xmodmap -e "keycode 113 = Alt_L ISO_Prev_Group ISO_Prev_Group NoSymbol
ISO_Prev_Group"
to your ~/.bashrc
cheers
-
This SF.
Am Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:34:36 -0200 schrieb Matías Graña:
> hi!
> I'm using e17 in two Gentoo boxes. In one of them, when I press
> Alt+Tab to switch active window, the widget stays there even after I
> release Alt and Tab. I make it disappear by pressing Enter, but this
> is annoying. The strange
Am Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:34:36 -0200
schrieb Matías Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi!
> I'm using e17 in two Gentoo boxes. In one of them, when I press
> Alt+Tab to switch active window, the widget stays there even after I
> release Alt and Tab. I make it disappear by pressing Enter, but this
> is an
hi!
I'm using e17 in two Gentoo boxes. In one of them, when I press Alt+Tab
to switch active window, the widget stays there even after I release Alt
and Tab. I make it disappear by pressing Enter, but this is annoying.
The strange thing is that I am compiling the same code in both boxes,
both are l
12 matches
Mail list logo
