On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 03:46:14 -0500, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 04 December 2004, at 14:47:41 (+0800),
Didier Casse wrote:
Well yeah... as raster said/meant, I used the notation found in the
spec file found in cvs. I don't know if it's good or bad. I don't
Hello!
Those with Fedora Core x and rpm-based distro can now install
enlightenment-0.17.0_pre10-NOT_RELEASE_1 (current one in cvs right
now) from my apt/yum repository.
refer to
http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe
Let me know if there are any glitches.
--
With kind regards,
Didier.
---
On Friday, 03 December 2004, at 18:19:16 (+0800),
Didier Casse wrote:
Those with Fedora Core x and rpm-based distro can now install
enlightenment-0.17.0_pre10-NOT_RELEASE_1 (current one in cvs right
now) from my apt/yum repository.
refer to
http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe
Let
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:19:16 +0800, Didier Casse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those with Fedora Core x and rpm-based distro can now install
enlightenment-0.17.0_pre10-NOT_RELEASE_1 (current one in cvs right
now) from my apt/yum repository.
refer to
http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:10:13 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Friday, 03 December 2004, at 18:19:16 (+0800),
Didier Casse wrote:
Those with Fedora Core x and rpm-based distro can now install
enlightenment-0.17.0_pre10-NOT_RELEASE_1 (current
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:54:46 +, Adam Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:19:16 +0800, Didier Casse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those with Fedora Core x and rpm-based distro can now install
enlightenment-0.17.0_pre10-NOT_RELEASE_1 (current one in cvs right
now)
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 09:55:10 +0900, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:10:13 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Friday, 03 December 2004, at 18:19:16 (+0800),
Didier Casse wrote:
Those with Fedora Core x and
