Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 22:20:46 (+0100), Morten Nilsen wrote: > how do I make the Escreen "window bar" less ugly? or even just hide it? Ctrl-Shift-RightClick Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-05 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 15:20:41 (-0600), Paul Johnson wrote: > in either Eterm or Aterm after it has started, or by changing the > environment for all programs in /etc/sysconfig/i18n. /etc/sysconfig/i18n has more than just LANG. Try altering the other variables too. Also make sure to

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-04 Thread J. Erik Heinz
Hi, Bu Bacoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> words on 03.11.2005 - 18:23 (+0100 Zulu-Time): >What kind of terminal do you use? ETerm and even any other do not >support e17-transparency, as modules do, right? I like transparent >terminal - it is the only app, where it makes some sense for

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Michael Jennings wrote: the only problem with eterm currently, is that it doesn't support utf-8. http://www.kainx.org/journal/?view=20050407 The chief reason I want utf-8 support in eterm is, in fact, to be able to paste non-ascii strings from mozilla The problem is that mozilla doesn't ex

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Berto wrote: Its just the bad quality of the screenshot, its very clear here, believe me, i hate not to see clearly just for a nice picture... maybe you should stop using jpeg then? png is nice and crisp -- Morten --- SF.Net email is spons

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Berto
Its just the bad quality of the screenshot, its very clear here, believe me, i hate not to see clearly just for a nice picture... Cheers 2005/11/3, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Berto wrote: > > Well...I like mine the way it is... > > > > http://www.tuxme.com/node/802?PHPSESSID=b8967047fd

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Berto wrote: Well...I like mine the way it is... http://www.tuxme.com/node/802?PHPSESSID=b8967047fd703e33b6fdb9252819ad89 how do you read folder names with that setup? here's what my e16 used to look like; http://gallery.elksex.com/display/incoming/screen5.png;max_scale=0 and here my new e1

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Berto
Well...I like mine the way it is... http://www.tuxme.com/node/802?PHPSESSID=b8967047fd703e33b6fdb9252819ad89 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be en

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Paul Johnson wrote: Morten Nilsen wrote: and now for an unrelated question about eterm; how do I make the Escreen "window bar" less ugly? or even just hide it? --buttonbar off no, that had no effect.. you do realize I'm talking about the one that comes up at the bottom of the term with

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Johnson
Morten Nilsen wrote: Michael Jennings wrote: and now for an unrelated question about eterm; how do I make the Escreen "window bar" less ugly? or even just hide it? --buttonbar off Cheers, -- Paul E. Johnson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Political Science

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Johnson
Виктор Кожухаров wrote: the only problem with eterm currently, is that it doesn't support utf-8. Speaking of utf-8, I just tested Aterm and noticed a REALLY Bad utf-8 related issue (in Fedora Core 4). I got aterm from the Fedora Extras, it is version aterm-1.0.0-1.fc4 Whereas Eterm will sh

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Michael Jennings wrote: On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 21:33:29 (+0100), Morten Nilsen wrote: on a related note, what is the default font of eterm? With --enable-auto-encoding, it varies. Without it, it's "fixed." Michael with some poking, I found this to be the one; -misc-fixed-me

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Виктор Кожухаров
so, everyone who follows cvs commits knows that you certainly tried to add it a year ago. I'm just stating what the only problem with eterm seems to be. (apart from some bad rendering of ncurses apps on some machines, but that probably isn't because of eterm). On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 16:10 -0500, Mi

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 23:07:55 (+0200), ?? ? wrote: > the only problem with eterm currently, is that it doesn't support > utf-8. http://www.kainx.org/journal/?view=20050407 Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Виктор Кожухаров wrote: the only problem with eterm currently, is that it doesn't support utf-8. nor does aterm, far as I could tell -- Morten --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Se

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Виктор Кожухаров
the only problem with eterm currently, is that it doesn't support utf-8. On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 15:40 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 21:33:29 (+0100), > Morten Nilsen wrote: > > > on a related note, what is the default font of eterm? > > With --enable-auto-enco

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 15:01:58 (-0600), Jesse Luehrs wrote: > Those themes are smaller, but still not as small (according to ps at > least... however accurate that is). It isn't. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., htt

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:10:25 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 14:01:11 (-0600), > Jesse Luehrs wrote: > > > It's smaller, less resource intensive, > > Neither of these is true. Eterm's default theme is simply fancier. > Try the "xterm" or "rxv

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 21:33:29 (+0100), Morten Nilsen wrote: > on a related note, what is the default font of eterm? With --enable-auto-encoding, it varies. Without it, it's "fixed." Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc.

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: James McCarthy wrote: Aterm is an excellent Eterm alternative. It's small and light and you really won't notice too much of a difference. It's mostly configurable by command line though, whereas Eterm let's you configure through menus as well. I'm not sure about the hype

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Berto wrote: mrxvt ...y based on aterm i thin, but with tabsits very fast loading...and eterm has near-instant load too very configurable. I love to use it with tabs, and fake transparency (the tabs an the scrollbar too) Take a look at the doc, has a lot of keys for everythin. I do

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 14:01:11 (-0600), Jesse Luehrs wrote: > It's smaller, less resource intensive, Neither of these is true. Eterm's default theme is simply fancier. Try the "xterm" or "rxvt" theme sometime. > and doesn't include a lot of the features that Eterm has that aren't >

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:42:55 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James McCarthy wrote: > > Aterm is an excellent Eterm alternative. It's small and light and > > you really won't notice too much of a difference. It's mostly > > configurable by command line though, whereas Eterm let's

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Berto
I forgot: i love "kuake" convined with "screen" toohttp://www.nemohackers.org/kuake.phpIt works pretty well on e17...

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Berto
mrxvt ...y based on aterm i thin, but with tabsits very fast loading...and very configurable.  I love  to  use it with tabs, and fake transparency (the tabs an the scrollbar too) Take a look at the doc, has a lot of keys for everythin. http://materm.sourceforge.net/sorry for my English2005/

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
James McCarthy wrote: Aterm is an excellent Eterm alternative. It's small and light and you really won't notice too much of a difference. It's mostly configurable by command line though, whereas Eterm let's you configure through menus as well. I'm not sure about the hyperlink part though. I

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread Morten Nilsen
Bu Bacoo wrote: Hello Folks What kind of terminal do you use? ETerm and even any other do not support e17-transparency, as modules do, right? I like transparent terminal - it is the only app, where it makes some sense for me. as far as I know, there is no such thing, really.. modules have tra

Re: [e-users] Terminal

2005-11-03 Thread James McCarthy
Aterm is an excellent Eterm alternative. It's small and light and you really won't notice too much of a difference. It's mostly configurable by command line though, whereas Eterm let's you configure through menus as well. I'm not sure about the hyperlink part though. On 11/3/05, Bu Bacoo <[EMAI

Re: [e-users] Terminal that renders to background canvas

2005-08-22 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:31:25 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 8/16/05, Mike Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible for a terminal application to render to E17's background > > canvas, just like the modules do, in order to provide a simulation of > > the fake t

Re: [e-users] Terminal that renders to background canvas

2005-08-19 Thread Mike Russo
Enterminus crashes with a floating point exception, running through gdb reveals what looks like a divide by zero condition: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/e17/proto/enterminus $ DISPLAY=:0 gdb src/bin/enterminus GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, cov

Re: [e-users] Terminal that renders to background canvas

2005-08-19 Thread Hisham Mardam Bey
On 8/16/05, Mike Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible for a terminal application to render to E17's background > canvas, just like the modules do, in order to provide a simulation of > the fake transparency we've all come to know and love (or at least > immortalize in screenshots)? If

Re: [e-users] Terminal that renders to background canvas

2005-08-18 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 15 August 2005, at 17:26:34 (-0400), Mike Russo wrote: > Is it possible for a terminal application to render to E17's > background canvas, just like the modules do, in order to provide a > simulation of the fake transparency we've all come to know and love > (or at least immortalize in