>> I can imagine that the EW 65 fits fine on an EOS 600/630. I know that it
>> bumps against the flash housing (under the "chin" of "Canon") on my two
>> EOS cameras.
> Really! Interesting. I guess there must be some variation in ES-65
> hoods. Mine fits under the pentaprism jut on my Elan 7 pe
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:57:09 -0500, you wrote:
>> I think we've been through this before, but, I have an ES-65 and 1)
>> mine is lined, and 2) mine does fit reversed. I don't see how the
>> hood interferes with the pop-up flash??
>
>Hi Ken,
>
>Yes, it is like /deja vu/, life repeating itself all
> I think we've been through this before, but, I have an ES-65 and 1)
> mine is lined, and 2) mine does fit reversed. I don't see how the
> hood interferes with the pop-up flash??
Hi Ken,
Yes, it is like /deja vu/, life repeating itself all over again ;-)
There is a lining of bumpy plastic on m
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:05:39 -0500, you wrote:
>1) The inner plastic surface has a slight sheen (and is not lined with
>Rayon anti-reflective flocking)
>
>2) The hood is deep - too deep to be stored mounted in reverse on your
>lens if you have a camera that has a popup flash.
I think we've been
> Ken is correct, the ES-65 is the hood made for the Mk I lens, but the newer
> one will fit as well. However, the new hood relies on an adapter ring that
> makes putting it on and take it off much more difficult. I cursed it for
> years until Julian once pointed out that there were two different v
Ken is correct, the ES-65 is the hood made for the Mk I lens, but the newer
one will fit as well. However, the new hood relies on an adapter ring that
makes putting it on and take it off much more difficult. I cursed it for
years until Julian once pointed out that there were two different versions.
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Reg wrote:
I've been told that the Metz SCA3102 adapter doesn't work with the EOS
300V because of changes in the design of the flash shoe electronics.
Is this so? If it is how does that affect the use of older Canon EOS
Speedlites with this camer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Just want to make sure I understand the concept of full time manual
>> focus properly before I go stripping any gears. Does this mean that
>> you can manually turn the focus ring to adjust focus even when the
>> lens is set to automatic focus AND you have depresse
I use an EW-65 II on mine, it's meant to be used with the 28mm or 35mm so
it might be a bit short but I figure it's better then no hood.
Mike
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.n
I've been told that the Metz SCA3102 adapter doesn't work with the EOS 300V
because of changes in the design of the flash shoe electronics. Is this
so? If it is how does that affect the use of older Canon EOS Speedlites
with this camera? Thanks for any advice.
Reg Ronaldson
Norwich UK
*
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 06:09 AM, Jaakko Pitkäjärvi wrote:
I just got my "new" lenses. I bought from a local guy two lenses, used
EF 28mm f2.8 and EF 50 mm f1.8 Mk I. My first prime lenses by the way.
Both are in excellent condition and virtually look like never used in
all surfac
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen J.
> Krogh
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the proof reading, just a slip in
> typing, faster than thinking. It was the same lens- the HSM version for
> Canon. I had been "shopping aroun
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:09:51 +0200, you wrote:
>is Mk II hood ES-62 suitable for Mk I 50mm lens? I suppose that, but if someone could
>confirm that,
The hood for the early 50/1.8 is the ES-65. Now the ES-62 may fit,
but I can't answer that one. The 65 is specified one, and the one I
have on mi
I just got my "new" lenses. I bought from a local guy two lenses, used EF 28mm f2.8
and EF 50 mm f1.8 Mk I. My first prime lenses by the way. Both are in excellent
condition and virtually look like never used in all surfaces and outfit. The price was
300 euros including the postage, so the deal
14 matches
Mail list logo
