> p.s. I'm upgrading from a Domke which is great for walking around
town, but
> my back is beginning to hurt from being lopsided weight-wise; also for
> Malaysia it's way too visible (screams: RICH JAPANESE ALERT! STEAL
ME! MUG
> ME!).
Funny. In most places (at least in Europe) Domke bags are co
Pattie Anderson wrote:
> and ideally, a little extra room so I can still use it if I get more
> equipment in the future.
Indeed! I have more bags than I need due to buying for what I had at the time
rather than what I had not much later--buy a bigger bag than you think you need.
OTOH, as other
I just bought the LowePro Rover AW Kit for my trip to Malaysia. It fits:
* EOS 3
* 550ex
* ST-E2
* EF 24mm f2.8
* EF 50mm f1.4
* EF 100mm f2.8 USM Macro (just arrived, beautiful lens! I'm hooked
already)
* PowerBook G3 (have to unhook the
I think the J=2 would be too small for her use.
I barely have room in mine for an A2, 1n, 28-135
and 100-400, the latter is roughly the size of
the 70-200 f2.8. I can stack my 50mm on top of
the 28-125, and put a flash in one of the end
pockets. I am about to buy (or maybe get for
Christmas, I
- Original Message -
From: "Chip Louie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...I use Domke's bags with the US
> postal service shoulder pad an am a happy man!
> I have some similar length lenses and am using larger EOS 1n/1nRS bodies
and
> need to be able to carry an EF 300 2.8L i
>
> I have outgrown my old camera bag, and I am looking for some
> recommendations
> for a new one. I'd prefer a shoulder bag (vs. a
> daypack/backpack), and need
> room for 2 EOS bodies (EOS-3 and my old Rebel 2000), two long L-series
> telephoto lenses (70-200 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 with hoods), on
The Lowepro Mag is an excellent choice and just fits under an airline seat or
in overhead. However, consider adding the backpack harness, which replaces
the shoulder strap and waist belt. With the included waist belt and should
harness you have nearly the comfort of a backpack, but the harness
I strongly suggest you check out Lowepro's Pro Mag 2 before making a
decision...My setup was very much like yours and it worked beautifully,
though now I have switched up to a 300/2.8 IS and the bag can still hold
70-200/2.8, 300/2.8, Body, a wide angle zoom, and 100 macro, plus some
other stuff.
-Original Message-
From: John Chennavasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>...Given that fully loaded this bag will weigh about 25 lbs, you
might want to
>look into a belt pack system (e.g. Kinesis or Lowepro Street and Field).
>Your back will appreciate it.
Pattie, I think John's right. Un
on 12/23/01 7:24 AM, Pattie Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have outgrown my old camera bag, and I am looking for some recommendations
> for a new one. I'd prefer a shoulder bag (vs. a daypack/backpack), and need
> room for 2 EOS bodies (EOS-3 and my old Rebel 2000), two long L-series
>
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 10:24:58 -0500, you wrote:
>I have outgrown my old camera bag, and I am looking for some recommendations
>for a new one. I'd prefer a shoulder bag (vs. a daypack/backpack), and need
>room for 2 EOS bodies (EOS-3 and my old Rebel 2000), two long L-series
>telephoto lenses (70-
I have outgrown my old camera bag, and I am looking for some recommendations
for a new one. I'd prefer a shoulder bag (vs. a daypack/backpack), and need
room for 2 EOS bodies (EOS-3 and my old Rebel 2000), two long L-series
telephoto lenses (70-200 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 with hoods), one or two smalle
12 matches
Mail list logo
