: [equinox-dev] OBR
This is not really true. The OSGi filter and the OBR filter are not
required to be the same. RFC 112 specifically allows the and (as
well as some other operators).
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 20 jan 2008, at 15:51, BJ Hargrave wrote:
This may be a problem in the tool
/2008 02:09 AM
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
RFC 112 is not a standard
I am also interested in this area. I will take a look on that too.thx
ChangWoo Jung
From:
Thomas Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Date:
01/22/2008 10:54 PM
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
ChangWoo,
There currently is no implementation
that and are specifically allowed. Rewriting bindex will not fix
the problem if
From:
Peter Kriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Date:
01/22/2008 02:09 AM
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
: Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
I guess I found little bug in the generated OBR repo (http://download.eclipse.org/releases/europa/repository.zip
)
The generated filter seems to be incorrect which throws exception in
the runtime.
For example, Jetty Http Service (org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty),
has
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
This is not really true. The OSGi filter and the OBR filter are not
required to be the same. RFC 112
.
Sincerely,
ChangWoo Jung
From:
Jeff McAffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Date:
01/12/2008 12:43 AM
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
We currently do host an OBR repo with the major releases. Don't remember
the URL but the required
]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/11/2008 10:46 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
I agree with this and I'd be willing to actually write the OBR
repository
development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
I agree with this and I'd be willing to actually write the OBR
repository adaptor for p2. Would you agree that the simplest way to do
that is probably to write it on top of the OBR
