> 1,2: I do not think that users will prefer the built-in console if Gogo is
> available, as long as the Equinox commands are available through Gogo.
I tend to agree especially because Gogo is likely better from a user
perspective.
> 5: in the implementation in the patch proposed in
> https://
vice or not should be added.
>>
>> Lazar
>>
>> From: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
>> [mailto:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
>> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:07 PM
>> To: Equinox development mailing list
>> Subje
|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>-------------------------------|
|Re: [equinox
be added.
>
> Lazar
>
> From: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:07 PM
> To: Equinox development mailing list
> Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Consol
Equinox development mailing list
Date:
12/03/2010 03:58 AM
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo
Technically if the framework is configured with the Gogo bundles to be
installed and started, and is run without th
boun...@eclipse.org [
mailto:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:50 PM
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for
Indigo
We also must consider the amount of work it would take to ext
-|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>-----------------------------------|
list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo
IMHO the bar for Indigo is pretty low. We need to make sure that Gogo can run
properly on Equinox. All servicability extension work can be focused on using
Gogo. Having a way to disable the current console would be
mailing list
Date: 2010/12/02 20:00
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo
for Indigo
Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
IMHO the bar for Indigo is pretty low. We need to make sure that Gogo can
run properly on Equinox. All servicability
parate bundle there is a bug opened:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169
>
>
> From:
> "Kirchev, Lazar"
>
> To:
> Equinox development mailing list
>
> Date:
> 12/02/2010 10:52 AM
>
> Subject:
> Re: [equinox-dev]
--------------------------------|
|Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo
|
>---
Date:
12/02/2010 09:37 AM
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo
The disadvantage is usability. Right now you get equinox and run with -console
and its all good. If we break it out you'll have to get two bundle
--|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>-----------------------|
|Re: [equinox-dev] Plan
The disadvantage is usability. Right now you get equinox and run with -console
and its all good. If we break it out you'll have to get two bundles and make
sure that the console bundle is started...
We have thought about shipping two setups, one with the console and one
without. That might w
On 1 Dec 2010, at 22:06, Thomas Watson wrote:
> There have been various discussions about replacing our framework console
> with something a bit more functional and flexible like apache gogo [1]. At
> this point in the Indigo release we do not plan to remove our own console for
> the Indigo rel
There have been various discussions about replacing our framework console
with something a bit more functional and flexible like apache gogo [1]. At
this point in the Indigo release we do not plan to remove our own console
for the Indigo release. Instead we will do what ever is required to enab
16 matches
Mail list logo
