Re: Newly revised Section 10 for ES3.1.

2008-07-14 Thread Sam Ruby
Mike Shaver wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Library additions have less of a concern for interaction with real-world >> content, but the idea of inserting the code into something that will >> ultimately ship does appeal to me. If I were to do the wo

Re: Two interoperable implementations rule

2008-07-14 Thread Sam Ruby
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > The WebKit project will accept patches for any feature of > 3.1 that has been reconciled with 4, and we will likely devote Apple > resources to implementing such features as well, so SquirrelFish will > likely be a candidate for one of the interoperable > implemen

Re: Two interoperable implementations rule

2008-07-14 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Jul 14, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> The WebKit project will accept patches for any feature of 3.1 that >> has been reconciled with 4, and we will likely devote Apple >> resources to implementing such features as well, so SquirrelFish >> will likely be

Re: Two interoperable implementations rule

2008-07-14 Thread Mike Shaver
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may be tricky to define, since many possible > candidate implementations are open source and developed > collaboratively by community contributors and overlapping sets of > vendors. For example, would Rhino and Spi

Re: Newly revised Section 10 for ES3.1.

2008-07-14 Thread Mike Shaver
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Shaver wrote: >> I can't see why not -- we'll certainly be looking to implement >> forthcoming editions of ECMAScript, and if decimal is a part of it >> then your code would certainly be helpful! > > Did you say "if"? Grr

Re: Two interoperable implementations rule

2008-07-14 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This may be tricky to define, since many possible > > candidate implementations are open source and developed > > collaboratively by community contributors and overlapping sets of > > vendors. For example, would Rh

Re: Two interoperable implementations rule

2008-07-14 Thread Mike Shaver
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Mike Cowlishaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (The decNumber code is quite stable, for example -- averaging fewer than one > detected bug/year since its first release in 2001, is used in numerous IBM, > SAP, and other vendors' products, and is part of the verification

Re: Two interoperable implementations rule

2008-07-14 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Mike Shaver wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Mike Cowlishaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> (The decNumber code is quite stable, for example -- averaging fewer >> than one >> detected bug/year since its first release in 2001, is used in >> numerous IBM,

Re: Proposed ES4 draft 2

2008-07-14 Thread Jeff Dyer
These documents are now available on the wiki in HTML as well as PDF formats: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=spec:spec Jd On 7/11/08 4:59 PM, Jeff Dyer wrote: > Enclosed is an update to the draft ES4 specs. This includes revisions of the > introduction, grammar and core-language spec