Re: [etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-10-11 Thread Florian Pose
Hello, On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:34:07PM +0200, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote: > I can only look into the specs available at ethercat.org > in ETG.1000.6 There is 5.6.7.4.10.1 Sync Manager PDO Assignment Sync > Manager Channel The Sync Manager Channel 0-31 object dictionary entry > (index 0x1C10-0x1C2

Re: [etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-10-04 Thread Thorsten Schnebeck
Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 14:47:10 schrieb Thorsten Schnebeck: > Am Freitag, 24. September 2010, 11:52:02 schrieb Florian Pose: > > It is definitely a problem of the slave firmware, the number of assigned > > PDOs (0x1c1x:0) must be an uint8. Please tell HBM. You can reference the > > EtherCAT

Re: [etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-09-27 Thread Thorsten Schnebeck
Am Freitag, 24. September 2010, 11:52:02 schrieb Florian Pose: > It is definitely a problem of the slave firmware, the number of assigned > PDOs (0x1c1x:0) must be an uint8. Please tell HBM. You can reference the > EtherCAT specification (IEC 61158-6-12, chapter 5.6.7.4.10.3, table 78). > > Apart

Re: [etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-09-24 Thread Florian Pose
Hello, On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:01:40AM +0200, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote: > Side note: TwinCAT does not show these problems and brings the device up to > OP-mode. this is because TwinCAT does not read out the PDO mapping. > Is this a problem in the EtherCAT slave client firmware or can this b

Re: [etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-09-24 Thread Thorsten Schnebeck
Am Freitag, 24. September 2010, 10:19:48 schrieben Sie: > Hello Mr Schnebeck, > > usually this is a problem of the slaves firmware. The fact that things > are running with TwinCat does not mean it is a fault free slave. > Things like this happen quiet regularly. > > If you can't solve the problem

Re: [etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-09-24 Thread Dr.-Ing. Wilhelm Hagemeister
Hello Mr Schnebeck, usually this is a problem of the slaves firmware. The fact that things are running with TwinCat does not mean it is a fault free slave. Things like this happen quiet regularly. If you can't solve the problem with HBM we can offer you to test the device here in Essen with our m

[etherlab-users] SDO type size problem

2010-09-24 Thread Thorsten Schnebeck
Hi, we have here a problem to bring a HBM etherCAT measurement box into PREOP state. The problem seems to be a SDO type size mishmash. Here is a part of the SDO list: = Master 0, Slave 0 === SDO 0x1000, "Device type" 0x1000:00, r-r-r-, uint32, 32 bit, "Device type" SDO 0x1008, "Device name" 0