[etherlab-users] Using BK/KL instead of EK/EL

2010-10-20 Thread Oliver.Haala
Hello Wilhelm, I am using handcoded C. (am not using Etherlab, writing an application on my own via libethercat) Yes, the "ethercat pdos" (with or without verbose) >should< give me a list of all the relevant PDO's. But it doesn't. Nor does "ethercat cstruct" provide any information. No output

Re: [etherlab-users] Using BK/KL instead of EK/EL

2010-10-19 Thread Dr.-Ing. Wilhelm Hagemeister
Hello Mr Haala, it is right, alle the KL are mapped in the the BK1120. Are you using handcoded C? Then a "ethercat pdos" should give you a list off all the relevant PDO's, which you have to map in your code. If you are using Matlab/Simulink generate a xml "ethercat xml" and use the generic sla

[etherlab-users] Using BK/KL instead of EK/EL

2010-10-19 Thread Oliver.Haala
Hello, I would like to use Beckhoffs BusCoupler (BK1120) and several bus terminals (KL). The problem is that the bus terminals are mapped inside the BusCoupler, so they aren't addressable like slaves. There is just one BK-slave. Unfortunately every example is using EK/EL. However is it possible