On 6/1/06, Jason LaPier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While we're on the subject of repositories - I was thinking about this last
night:
Does anyone know of a recommended path for using subversion to keep track of
actual documents (ie non-code)?
svn can be used as a backing store, start reading he
Jason LaPier wrote:
> Does anyone know of a recommended path for using subversion to keep track of
> actual documents (ie non-code)?
I would check the binary files into SVN directly.
Advantages:
Easy to learn, easy to do. Check it in, check it out,
just like any other file.
Dis
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Barrett
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:40 AM
> To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group
> Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Oo.org and svn
>
> Does HTML beat out RTF (rich text f
Does HTML beat out RTF (rich text format) for this use, for you? Some of you out there might be interested in using UnionFS to help version your documents or code/projects:
http://www.filesystems.org/project-unionfs.htmlAlso: I thought OOo's docbook has some sense of versioning within the format,
While we're on the subject of repositories - I was thinking about this last
night:
Does anyone know of a recommended path for using subversion to keep track of
actual documents (ie non-code)? I've heard of some people using XML-based
documents for this sort of thing, where they can check-in and ch
