I have some headway cells in the original boxes, charge them every few
months, if I wait too long some will be 2V and others 3.65, from being
equal the time before. I have jigs to measure self discharge directly, a
4 wire very accurate charger with a current measurement, I calculate the
self
Hey thanks for your input. I’m sure a lot of people have varied experiences. I
must’ve met there probably differences between manufacturers. However that was
not my experience. I bought Bestgo sales hundred amp hour. I did extensive
testing before installing them in a vehicle. I put 40 for 100
>From: Cor van de Water via EV
>I also did tests on LiFePO4 cells and while self-discharge was low, I was able
>to prove from my measurements over many weeks, that there is was about a
>factor 2 difference in self-discharge current between the best and worst cell.
>Sample
Another thing, I see the ebike chargers have 2 voltage pots, I think one
is for the ballance charge, at reduced current. Have anyone seem this?
On 12-May-18 6:47 AM, paul dove via EV wrote:
Thanks that was interesting. It’s more likely that the Dakota BMS was causing
the imbalance with
I have used headway cells, headway specs them as 5% per month self
discharge! so have close to zero, worse is 5 in practice. found it to be
a big problem, if you charge every day it's ok, but the ebike i got them
for may go a while without charging, also, If it is not left on charge
long
I also did tests on LiFePO4 cells and while self-discharge was low, I was able
to prove from my measurements over many weeks, that there is was about a factor
2 difference in self-discharge current between the best and worst cell. Sample
size was over 40 cells.
This is exactly what the author
Actually I do have evidence. I did extensive testing with LiFePO4 cells. I
found no evidence of self discharge or of balance issues with cells connected
in series.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 11, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Bill Dube via EV wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> Do you have any
Paul,
Do you have any evidence of this or is it speculation?
(Sorry, I just couldn't help myself.)
Bill D
On 5/11/2018 12:47 PM, paul dove via EV wrote:
Thanks that was interesting. It’s more likely that the Dakota BMS was causing
the imbalance with parasitic unbalanced loads, however.
Thanks that was interesting. It’s more likely that the Dakota BMS was causing
the imbalance with parasitic unbalanced loads, however.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 11, 2018, at 11:56 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV
> wrote:
>
>> On 10 May 2018 at 6:35, paul dove via EV wrote:
On 10 May 2018 at 6:35, paul dove via EV wrote:
> Do you have any evidence of these batteries failing because of out of balance
> conditions or is that speculation
The battery I mentioned ("Dakota" brand) was advertised as having a true
balancing BMS.
Discussion of PCBs vs BMSes here:
Do you have any evidence of these batteries failing because of out of balance
conditions or is that speculation
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2018, at 9:22 PM, EVDL Administrator via EV
> wrote:
>
>> On 9 May 2018 at 21:21, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:
>>
>> wait a
On 9 May 2018 at 21:21, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:
> wait a couple weeks as totally protected drop in replacements changing
> a 35 ah form factor into a 50 ah battery with many more cycles made
> from lithium was coming.
I've seen a lot of these around already. I almost bought a small one
This carbon lead issue is dead for me. I asked Jim at American Battery in
Hayward about carbon/lead batteries and he said wait a couple weeks as totally
protected drop in replacements changing a 35 ah form factor into a 50 ah
battery with many more cycles made from lithium was coming. These
13 matches
Mail list logo