Hi John:
At 06:12 PM 12/26/2004, you wrote:
Dear Hal,
is there some draft seeable on the web?
Not yet. If the idea still looks good at the end of this thread I intend
to post something on my web page with visual aids etc.
I thought I am comfortable with your
terminology (whether I understand it
Dear Hal,
is there some draft seeable on the web? I thought I am comfortable with your
terminology (whether I understand it or not) but now I wonder:
Is Everything part of All, or All part of Everything? Then again it should
be that Nothing is part of Everything, maybe not necessarily of All. You
c
Hi Stephen:
Since the Nothing has no information by definition and the boundary between
them - the Everything - has no potential to divide further [i.e. no
information] then the All must have no information if the system has no
information. I do not think the latter part is controversial. For
Dear Hal,
About this "zero information" feature, could it be due to a strict
communitivity between any given "subset" of the All/Nothing? I ask this
because it seems to me that the "information content" of any string follows
from the existence of a difference between one ordering of the "bits
Below is a background for my model and a rewrite of the original post.
My concerns with a TOE which I am trying to resolve are:
I would like to see the theory have a zero information content.
I would like an origin for what we perceive as a changing reality - a dynamic.
Postulating the existence of
5 matches
Mail list logo
