On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:11:32PM -0700, Wei Dai wrote:
>
> Youness Ayaita wrote:
> > Directly speaking: Since all observers must expect to get their next
> > observer moments out of the same ensemble of observer moments, there
> > is no reason to insist on different preferences.
>
> Youness, A
Youness Ayaita wrote:
> Directly speaking: Since all observers must expect to get their next
> observer moments out of the same ensemble of observer moments, there
> is no reason to insist on different preferences.
Youness, ASSA does not mean what you think, that "all observers must expect
to ge
Hi George,
Le 03-oct.-07, à 01:52, George Levy a écrit :
> Hi Bruno,
> Yes I am still on the list, barely trying to keep up, but I have been
> very busy. Actually the ball was in my court and I was supposed to
> answer to your last post to me about a year ago!!!. Generally I agree
> with y
Le 02-oct.-07, à 01:30, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
>
> On 02/10/2007, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Also single mind can be regarded as collection of parts interacting
>> with each other. If each part can be regarded as its information
>> content, each physical implementatio
On Oct 3, 12:23 pm, Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that beauty is effectively a channel from our
> unconscious. When we think that something is beautiful (or conversely
> ugly), some unconscious processing has taken place according to some
> criterion and presented to the
5 matches
Mail list logo