Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Brent Meeker :
>
>
>> The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the passage
>> of
>> (simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states, ignoring
>> their
>> causal/temporal relations, how will they create the consciousn
2009/1/10 Brent Meeker :
> The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the passage of
> (simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states, ignoring their
> causal/temporal relations, how will they create the consciousness of time in
> the
> simulated observer?
A
Kim Jones wrote:
>
> On 10/01/2009, at 6:37 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>> The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the
>> passage of
>> (simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states,
>> ignoring their
>> causal/temporal relations, how will they create t
Brent,
there are misunderstood phenomena and epistemologically underdeveloped
explanations over the past 10,000 years - plus conclusion (upon
conlusions)^n - quantizations with and without zero (14th c. AD) to develop
in our conventional scientific view the figment Bruno puts into " - " called
"The
Steinhardt is supposed to get his book Infinite Flesh published sometime
soon. His premise is similar to Philosopher, John Leslie, save that Steinhardt
see clones of ourselves being re-born in alternate universes, though the each
incarnation is improved over the previous. Leslie is more linea
Hi Bruno,
> I don't understand what you mean by computations being infinitely far
> away. In the UD deployment, which I will wrote UD*, all computations
> begins soon or later (like all dominoes falls soon or later in the
> infinite discrete dominoe-sequences). All computations reach any of
On 09 Jan 2009, at 20:12, Günther Greindl wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
>> and Cantor get a contradiction from that. You assume the diagram is
>> indeed a piece of an existing bijection in Platonia, or known by God.
>
> No, you misunderstand me there - I just meant that we need to take the
> step to i
On 10/01/2009, at 6:37 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
> The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the
> passage of
> (simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states,
> ignoring their
> causal/temporal relations, how will they create the consciousness of
> time
8 matches
Mail list logo
