On 09 Jul 2012, at 19:45, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/9/2012 10:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:26 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
How do you derive fermions and bosons from comp?
I don't know how to derive fermions and bosons from nothing but
arithmetic but you
On 09 Jul 2012, at 19:52, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 07.07.2012 21:54 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 07 Jul 2012, at 15:31, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
My comments to Grand Design by Stephen Hawking and Leonard
Mlodinow, especially to the statement from the book
“Traditionally these are
On 09 Jul 2012, at 22:01, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno, thanks for your 'views' expressed to Evgeniy below.
...Why people believe... I think we agreed that no such thing in
our access as a Theory of Everything (omniscience missing) and the
figments scientists believe IN are fables.
Probably.
Socratus: Metaphysics ( science and religion)
==.
Physics and Religion:
a) T=0K
b) c/d=pi, R/N=k, E/M=c^2, h=0, c=0
Mathematics and Religion:
i^2= -1, e^ipi= -1
Biology and Religion:
Vitalism
Practice and Religion:
Meditation, Parapsychology.
==.
Israel Socratus
--
You received this message
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
I do not not understand in this respect your analogy with chess.
You may know all the rules of chess but that does not mean you know what
all the complex interactions those rules could lead to, and that is why you
are not
There is something deeply religious in many scientifics in his quest to
expand their Truth. And there is also something very philosophical indeed.
But they ignore both. They ignore their beliefs and their positivistic
metaphisics, born in the disputes between nominalists and realists during
the
On 7/10/2012 10:49 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
There is something deeply religious in many scientifics in his quest to expand their
Truth. And there is also something very philosophical indeed. But they ignore both. They
ignore their beliefs and their positivistic metaphisics, born in the
Say that it is not so!
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle/?ref=rss
--
Onward!
Stephen
Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed.
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything
On 10.07.2012 09:47 Bruno Marchal said the following:
...
The whole of the human sciences is perverted since theology get out
of the academy. Philosophy is often just a religious reaction to
institutionalized religion. God id dead, said Nietzsche, so ...
what do we do?
In Germany theology
On 10.07.2012 18:03 John Clark said the following:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
I do not not understand in this respect your analogy with chess.
You may know all the rules of chess but that does not mean you know
what all the complex interactions
On 10.07.2012 19:49 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
There is something deeply religious in many scientifics in his quest
to expand their Truth. And there is also something very philosophical
indeed. But they ignore both. They ignore their beliefs and their
positivistic metaphisics, born in
On 7/10/2012 12:38 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Hence according to the authors, the M-theory governs absolutely everything including
social sciences. But I am afraid that this is not what you would expect.
Why would you not expect a theory-of-everything to include the behavior of people? Note
Stephen, a 'belief system' may be reassuring.
I spent a lifetime in active RD exercising conventional science, till I
lost by belief in many figments of it. It came gradually like one's losing
a religious faith: trying to THINK 'outside the box' and getting nowhere.
(First reflection: I am poorly
Hi John,
What I have been doing is exploring the soft underbelly of physics,
those sets of truths that are just assumed to be true. For example, I
have become convinced that a lot of the difficulties in physics are due
to its assumption that substance is primitive. There is even an entire
On 7/7/2012 1:40 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
mailto:use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
Hawking and Mlodinow start with the statement that free will is
illusion
If they said that, and I don't recall that they did, they were being
much too kind in
2012/7/10 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 7/10/2012 10:49 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
There is something deeply religious in many scientifics in his quest to
expand their Truth. And there is also something very philosophical indeed.
But they ignore both. They ignore their beliefs and
16 matches
Mail list logo
