On 02 Aug 2012, at 21:34, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
I do not want to suggest a definition, but have a question
concerning comp frame. When I improvise, often in Jazz or Rock
context the free will question becomes fuzzy in this way:
Sometimes you hit a point where all the
On 02 Aug 2012, at 21:55, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The problem is I have no conception of free will and neither do
you nor does anybody else, at least not a consistent coherent one
that has any depth.
This contradicts your own
On 03 Aug 2012, at 01:43, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Evgnii,. The question is that the mind is not the brain in the same
way that Microsoft Word running in a computer ins not the computer.
The intuitive notion of location of our self, our mind behind de
eyes and thus inside the skull is not
On 02 Aug 2012, at 23:26, Jason Resch wrote:
I came across this today, which I thought others on this list might
enjoy
http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2012/08/01/memories-of-kurt-godel/
Among other things Godel mentions a belief in the illusion of time,
compatibilist free will, Platonism,
If rationality is used in the technical sense then the irrational category
becomes too broad because it includes doing the right thing under the
current resources (time, computing power, knowledge) and any other plain
dumb action.
El ago 3, 2012 1:16 a.m., Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
Dear Bruno,
On 8/3/2012 3:55 AM in post Re: Stephen Hawking: Philosophy is Dead,
Bruno Marchal wrote:
There is no recipe for intelligence. Only for domain competence.
Intelligence can diagonalize again all recipes.
A very good point! Intelligence is thus forever beyond a horizon or
On 03 Aug 2012, at 11:43, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On 8/3/2012 3:55 AM in post Re: Stephen Hawking: Philosophy is
Dead, Bruno Marchal wrote:
There is no recipe for intelligence. Only for domain competence.
Intelligence can diagonalize again all recipes.
A very good
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Aug 2012, at 21:34, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
I do not want to suggest a definition, but have a question concerning comp
frame. When I improvise, often in Jazz or Rock context the free will
question becomes
arXiv:1208.0493v1 [quant-ph]
anything useful here?
Ronald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/o8kakXvUvOIJ.
To post to this
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Define God
The God I don't believe in is a omniscient omnipotent being who created the
universe. If you define God, as so many fans of the word but not the idea
do, as a force greater than myself then I am a devout believer
On 03 Aug 2012, at 17:34, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Define God
The God I don't believe in is a omniscient omnipotent being who
created the universe. If you define God, as so many fans of the
word but not the idea do, as a force
On 03 Aug 2012, at 15:10, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 02 Aug 2012, at 21:34, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
I do not want to suggest a definition, but have a question
concerning comp frame. When I improvise,
On 8/3/2012 8:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Aug 2012, at 11:43, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On 8/3/2012 3:55 AM in post Re: Stephen Hawking: Philosophy is
Dead, Bruno Marchal wrote:
There is no recipe for intelligence. Only for domain competence.
Intelligence can diagonalize
Stephen and Bruno:
enjoyable reading. About that darn intelligence?
I have my roots in Latin so my take is inter-lego - to READ between the
lines (or words). I add some (believed) points to it: we like to go to the
utmost of our 'knowledge - base' with (intelligent-ha ha) thinking and HAVE
Dear Cowboy,
thanks for your teaching on the repetitive (rock-related??) musical
experience. Since I am strongly anchored into the past 3-5 centuries'
organized 'music' I do not appreciate it.
However it punches into the domain of what is callable a Free Will (not
really, as I will explain).
So you don't know what God wants. Is that what you're saying? I hope
you're not for any reason obsessed with the Bible.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:43 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Brian Tenneson tenn...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you know what God
On 8/3/2012 11:09 AM, ronaldheld wrote:
arXiv:1208.0493v1 [quant-ph]
Hi Ronald,
A nice paper! A quote from it:
In this work we introduce a postulate named Existence of an Information
Unit, which essentially states that there is only one type of
information within the theory.
17 matches
Mail list logo
