Leibniz was quite the dandy!

What is matter? Never mind. What is mind? No matter. If life isn't non-physical, why can't I understand it? I think it's time I had some cake -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

If a donut was baked that was large enough, would the hole in the middle of it be so large that even God couldn't eat it?

Should the holes in donuts even count as part of the donut? If so, what of Timbits? Could God eat so many donuts that there would be none left for us? Could we, perhaps term this the donut catastrophe? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything

If life is nonphysical, can it survive a black hole catastrophe ?

If life is nonphysical, can it survive a black hole catastrophe ? No, then shouldn't it eventually be cleaned up out of the universe filled with so many black holes ? How about mind, can it remember information through such an experience ? Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000] See my Leibn

Re: Whui I keep posting about Leibniz

On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > I am accused of wasting peoples' time by constantly posting here and > elsewhere on the subject of Leibniz. > I have nothing against Leibniz and that's not why you're wasting people's time, it's because whenever anybody has a problem with wha

Leibniz, now Leibniz was a man...

A way out west there was a fella, fella I want to tell you about, fella by the name of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. At least, that was the handle his lovin' parents gave him, but he never had much use for it himself. This Leibniz, he called himself das Dude. Now, Dude, that's a name no

Re: Whui I keep posting about Leibniz

Roger, Just because you perceive that people are 'wasting their time' by providing their own unique points of view on questions dear to their heart (and not, by the way, on rehashing simplistic strawmen positions of philosophers that lived during the Age of Enlightenment) does not give you lic

Whui I keep posting about Leibniz

Hi tintner michael and Albert Cororna, I am accused of wasting peoples' time by constantly posting here and elsewhere on the subject of Leibniz. I do that because people are already wasting their time by posting totally impossible views on what mind is or what consciousness is, supposedly the c

RE: The stupid legacy of another crackpot, Roger Clough

A link to some video is all you got? Small potatoes in terms of evidence my dear fellow. From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alberto G. Corona Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 12:56 AM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: T

Re: The stupid legacy of another crackpot, Roger Clough

Just look at the video. Search for yourself and think. I have no interest neither is worth the effort to convince peopelle that overreact in such a way El 03/08/2013 00:42, "Chris de Morsella" escribió: > When challenged to produce some actual body of evidence to back up your > wholesale characte