On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:51:30PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> I think that Russell is right when he suggested that even by step
> seven your dovetailer has to be running in Platonia, not in a
> physical embodiment. This has to do with the fact that the
> dovetailer can never complete. It is r
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 9:19 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Histones (proteins that form the scaffolding around which DNA
wraps itself may also themselves be involved i
On 6 April 2015 at 08:10, meekerdb wrote:
> On 4/5/2015 9:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> If you mean something else by physical, I have no idea what you mean.
>
>
> It is what is studied by physics, mainly through empirical means: the
> measurable quantities in laboratories.
>
> Aristotle (w
By the way, the phrase "above my paygrade" was invented by someone less
intelligent than you to keep you in your place, at least until they get
around to reintroducing full scale feudalism.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To u
> *Subject:* Re: DNA Wormholes can cause cancer (what!?)
>
> Chris,
>
Hi. It sounds like you might be in computing since you mentioned some
terms like "reposited" (I've never heard of that in bio!)? If so, you are
very well educated in biology. Nice job! Your knowledge of the complexi
Anything in the egg cell, or donated at any point during gestation from the
mother (in mammals, at least) can be passed on, I assume. (What about
mitochondria?)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
On 7 April 2015 at 11:58, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>> > you feel that you are the same person from day to day and year to year,
>> > even if you know this is an illusion.
>
>
> How would things be different if this were not an illusion?
You are less t
That all sounds very plausible to me. (Although sadly my pay grade doesn't
match that fact.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+u
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Apr 2015, at 13:25, Bruce Kellett wrote:
You want a dynamic like in physics, a function from time to space, but
in computer science, and to understand the problem here, the dynamics
are given by function from N to "mind states".
You need to give magical ability to
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Apr 2015, at 13:25, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
To be more precise, I should explain you how "computations" and
"emulation" is defined in arithmetic, in term of the truth of
elementary number theoretical relations. A computation will exist
through th
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> you feel that you are the same person from day to day and year to year,
> even if you know this is an illusion.
How would things be different if this were not an illusion?
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
On 7 April 2015 at 09:57, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>>> Assuming you're like me, you perceive yourself as a single entity
>>> travelling through time in the forward direction.
>>>
>>>
>>> >> You? Mr. John Clark The Moscow Man will perceive a single
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>> Assuming you're like me, you perceive yourself as a single entity
>>> travelling through time in the forward direction.
>>>
>>
>> >> You? Mr. John Clark The Moscow Man will perceive a single entity, and
>> Mr. John Clark the Washington Man will percei
Samiya, you sweetly fell into the trap of my polite sentence *(...smarter
than me*).
I did not mention "absolute" smart. And: I did not ask 'where God came
from' - although in an eaarlier post I raised the question 'where (from
what system) did the mentioned 'God' come from?
A ask, however, Bruno
On 06 Apr 2015, at 13:25, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Apr 2015, at 07:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2015, at 01:19, Russell Standish wrote:
Then what is your definition of a recording? In my eyes, UD* is a
recording, particularly a finite porti
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:45 PM, meekerdb wrote:
>
>
> It was a totalitarian government, like within a single corporation.
> Nothing at all like Marx imagined. Where Marx's idea has been realized is
> in the Amana colonies in the US and the kibbutz in Israel. So why didn't
> they devolve into to
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:04 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> > If you take the MWI seriously, then you are open to the possibility that
>> you are constantly being duplicated
>>
>
> If the MWI is true then it's not a possibility it's a certainty
>
>
>> > Ass
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 , meekerdb wrote:
> > In general you can't assume that it takes one critical mass to make a
> bomb.
>
You do unless you're very sophisticated, otherwise it will likely take you
more than one critical mass to make a bomb, for example the critical mass
of U235 is 114 pounds bu
Yes, this discussion is, as the saying goes, "above my pay grade" but I do it
to please (neurobiologically) my amygdala, and satisfy my cerebrum. Since I am
stealing and modifying Eric Steinhart's theories on the Universe(s),
consciousness, Leibniz, existence, and all the rest, I would say that
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Apr 2015, at 07:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2015, at 01:19, Russell Standish wrote:
Then what is your definition of a recording? In my eyes, UD* is a
recording, particularly a finite portion of it, such as the first
10,000 steps of the f
Agreed.
-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
To: everything-list
Sent: Sun, Apr 5, 2015 9:37 pm
Subject: RE: Fast moves for nuclear development in Siberia
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent
Brent,
Fear of a nuclear accident, in the 80's Chernobyl, and in 2011, Fukushima. In
Germany, the government shutdown uranium, and bought tons and tons, of cheap US
bituminous and anthracite, to burn in their old, power plants. Merkel started
last year, to re-light the atom plants once again,
On 04 Apr 2015, at 19:04, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
My view is that rather than being a simulation, our universe and an
infinitude of others,are programs that yields physical universes, as
a programmatic process.
?
That seems contradictory. Being a simulation means being brough
On 06 Apr 2015, at 07:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2015, at 01:19, Russell Standish wrote:
Then what is your definition of a recording? In my eyes, UD* is a
recording, particularly a finite portion of it, such as the first
10,000 steps of the first 10,000 programs.
On 06 Apr 2015, at 08:09, Samiya Illias wrote:
John,
How is it possible to find someone absolutely 'smarter' when each
one knows/understands something more about something than others,
and is less informed about something than someone else?
The scriptures seem to be the only source of 'smar
25 matches
Mail list logo
